Hi Harm,
I cannot comment much on the code, but I like the general approach of
separating chord information and chord markup very much!
Two tiny remarks below.
https://codereview.appspot.com/223420043/diff/20001/scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm
File scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm (right):
https://c
On 2015/04/10 09:42:38, dak wrote:
In this particular case, it would appear that
Includable_lexer::file_name_strings_ already contains properly
expanded file
names after the file name search has succeeded, so that would seem to
be the
smarter thing to reference.
Here’s what I came up with;
Please review.
Intended is a pure maintaining change. Maybe a first step for more
flexibility, easier customizing etc.
If I sorted it correctly, no change in visible output should occur.
Apart from the Banter-style (see commit-message) no bug-fixing happens,
although I noticed one (see FIXME in
On 2015/04/11 07:43:55, dak wrote:
See the Button marked "Delete" in the following screen shot.
Thanks.
I’ve triple-checked this patch and it doesn’t appear to be breaking
anything (I’m running make check again just in case, but I’ll feel
reassured once it’s checked by other people as well); h
> I'm not top-posting.
Here is one more revision of my study in combining parts without using
the partcombine iterator. This version explores multiple styles, such as
showing unisons with multiple heads or keeping rests visible through
solo passages.
Now I have a question about architecture. Is
On 4/11/2015 2:08 PM, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
Installed contains the results of running the program
after installation only on that snippets.
As it works, I am very puzzled.
$ lilypond --png lily-487dce2c.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
Processing `lily-487dce2c.ly'
Parsing...
Renaming input to: `out-w
> Installed contains the results of running the program
> after installation only on that snippets.
> As it works, I am very puzzled.
>
> $ lilypond --png lily-487dce2c.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
> Processing `lily-487dce2c.ly'
> Parsing...
> Renaming input to: `out-www/quantize-start-midi.ly'
> Int
Marco Atzeri writes:
> On 4/11/2015 12:29 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I presume that lilypond is calling gs with a not recognized option
>>> only on this specific snippet.
>>
>> So which snippet is it? I don't know all the checksums by heart...
>> There likely should be some file
>>
>> /c
On 4/11/2015 12:29 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
I presume that lilypond is calling gs with a not recognized option
only on this specific snippet.
So which snippet is it? I don't know all the checksums by heart...
There likely should be some file
/cygdrive/e/cyg_pub/devel/lilypond/lilypond-2.18.
Marco Atzeri writes:
> On 4/11/2015 8:57 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2015 8:09 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Marco Atzeri writes:
>>>
I am trying to build and package 2.18.2 for cygwin 64 bit.
I am currently stacked in building the documentation
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
The l
On 4/11/2015 8:57 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 4/11/2015 8:09 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Marco Atzeri writes:
I am trying to build and package 2.18.2 for cygwin 64 bit.
I am currently stacked in building the documentation
[...]
The log is not very informative
--
v.villen...@gmail.com writes:
> What a mess. I inadvertently uploaded my "round 2" proposal onto this
> issue where it doesn’t belong.
>
> Since Rietveld doesn’t seem to offer a way of undoing it,
See the Button marked "Delete" in the following screen shot.
> please disregard "patch set #10" (
What a mess. I inadvertently uploaded my "round 2" proposal onto this
issue where it doesn’t belong.
Since Rietveld doesn’t seem to offer a way of undoing it, please
disregard "patch set #10" (#9 is the one actually being reviewed, with
all of David’s suggestions taken into account).
https://cod
13 matches
Mail list logo
