Pushed:
authorPaul Morris
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 02:32:42 + (22:32 -0400)
committerJames Lowe
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:33:48 + (08:33 +0100)
commita3fc862086a720201e4a4764c7beb952fab5f106
https://codereview.appspot.com/264810043/
__
2015-08-30 23:27 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> Am 30.08.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’m quite surprised that the command line output of Git displayed in
>> lily-git.tcl is in German
>
>
> While the messages from lily-git itself are English…
>
>
>> – if I run Git directly
Am 30.08.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Hello,
I’m quite surprised that the command line output of Git displayed in
lily-git.tcl is in German
While the messages from lily-git itself are English…
– if I run Git directly from the terminal, it’s English, and indeed
I’ve even changed the
Am 30.08.2015 um 22:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
@Bug Squad
I've noticed a couple of things about Allura which are
worth mentioning:
a) When you add a new issue or change the status,
patch, label, etc, of an existing one, it takes
some time, i.e. several minutes, before it shows
up in
Hello,
I’m quite surprised that the command line output of Git displayed in
lily-git.tcl is in German – if I run Git directly from the terminal,
it’s English, and indeed I’ve even changed the language of my whole
system to English by now (that was before I had lily-git.tcl). How can I
fix tha
@Bug Squad
I've noticed a couple of things about Allura which are
worth mentioning:
a) When you add a new issue or change the status,
patch, label, etc, of an existing one, it takes
some time, i.e. several minutes, before it shows
up in searches involving the new value. Allura
maint
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
http://translationproject.org/POT-files
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond.org - file storage
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
We also have source files back to 0.0 and 1.0. I assume we could
never rec
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Charles Malahieude"
To: "Graham Percival" ; "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond.org - file storage
Le 30/08/2015 17:45, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
@Bug Squad
The new Issues DB at SourceForge is live and has been updated by James to
reflect the current state of patches. There are a few new issues that are yet
to be added, in particular the ones Simon raised on the bug list. These will
now need to be given new serial numbers as James has
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
>
> BTW, is there any difference between download/source and download/sources ?
I'm pretty certain that one is a symlink of the other. If not, then one
was a place to store some odd tarballs for GUB to download.
Cheers,
-
Phil Holmes wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:15 PM
> I've actually downloaded the test-output for 2.15.30 - 39 in case anyone
> objects, and it looks like the upload is back running again. I'll leave it
> another day or so, but then plan to *delete* all the 2.15 files, except
> 15.95.
>
> We
James wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 4:22 PM
> I've 'synced' my list of Patches I've been keeping track of manually
> with the issues list now.
>
> Is this set of issues going to be the one we migrate to the 'new' non-SF
> system?
>
> I.e. do we now treat this as a live system?
Yes. When we mi
Le 30/08/2015 17:45, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
We also have source files back to 0.0 and 1.0. I assume we could
never recreate these from Git, but are we ever going to need to? It
certainly seems pointless keeping lots of source tarb
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 14:41 on 30 Aug 2015, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes,
>
> Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in font-family-override.ly
And in kievan-notation.ly the spacing of the lyrics in-syllable is
awful. Whatever font
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> We also have source files back to 0.0 and 1.0. I assume we could
> never recreate these from Git, but are we ever going to need to? It
> certainly seems pointless keeping lots of source tarballs, given
> that all the more recent histo
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 14:41 on 30 Aug 2015, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes,
>
> Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in
> font-family-override.ly
Well, I call uh-oh. It will probably take a few more unstable releases
to shake out t
Hello Trevor,
On 30/08/15 15:00, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM
>
>> Some comments if I may be so bold.
> Of course - most welcome!
>
>> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
>> hand side panel) for each of the Patch stat
At 14:41 on 30 Aug 2015, Phil Holmes wrote:
>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes,
Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in font-family-override.ly
--
Mark Knoop
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hi James
The issues and issue numbers you've added don't seem to correspond with those
Simon posted on the bug list. For example:
Simon's:
ID: 4579
STATUS: New
SUMMARY: Document tweaking of StaffSymbol and LedgerLineSpanner
TYPE: Documentation
Yours:
> ** [issues:#4579] NR Changing Def
Phil Holmes writes:
> There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes, but I'd like
> someone who understands autochange to look at
>
> autochange-inside-grace.ly
>
> http://lilypond.org/test/v2.19.26-1/compare-v2.19.25-1/index.html
>
> Is this change expected?
Yes, this change is
Hi,
Please find a new tarball for LilyPond at
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/source/v2.19/lilypond-2.19.26.tar.gz
Cheers,
Jean-Charles Malahieude
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes, but I'd like
someone who understands autochange to look at
autochange-inside-grace.ly
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.19.26-1/compare-v2.19.25-1/index.html
Is this change expected?
___
lilypo
James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM
> Some comments if I may be so bold.
Of course - most welcome!
> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
> hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
>
> New
> Review
> Countdown
> Push
Presumably you'd like t
Hello Trevor,
Some comments if I may be so bold.
1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
New
Review
Countdown
Push
At the moment we have 'Review' only.
The 'Fixed' search
2. It seems that the 'Needs' field is mandato
Passes make, make check and a full make doc
PATCH_REVIEW
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: lilypond.org - file storage
Hello,
On 30/08/15 11:34, Phil Holmes wrote:
OK - it looks like lilypond.org is now back, and I can SSH to it again.
However, I still can't complet
On 2015/08/30 12:02:14, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/08/30 11:44:52, dak wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
> File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#
On 2015/08/30 11:44:52, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode1758
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:1758: (defi
Passes make, make check and a full make doc
PATCH_REVIEW
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/diff/1/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode1758
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:1758: (define-markup-command
(combine-list layout
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review
PATCH_NEW
Description:
Implement new markup-command combine-list
Allows for \markup \combine-list { a list }
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/264960043/
Affected files (+23, -5 lines):
M scm/define-markup-commands.scm
Index: scm/def
Hello,
On 30/08/15 11:34, Phil Holmes wrote:
> OK - it looks like lilypond.org is now back, and I can SSH to it again.
> However, I still can't complete the upload of files because of lack of
> disk space on the server. I've emailed the admin but no response yet.
>
> That said, we do seem to b
Phil Holmes wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 11:34 AM
> OK - it looks like lilypond.org is now back, and I can SSH to it again.
> However, I still can't complete the upload of files because of lack of
> disk space on the server. I've emailed the admin but no response yet.
>
> That said, we do
OK - it looks like lilypond.org is now back, and I can SSH to it again.
However, I still can't complete the upload of files because of lack of
disk space on the server. I've emailed the admin but no response yet.
That said, we do seem to be storing an enormous amount of potentially
unneeded s
Passes make, make check and a full make doc
PATCH_REVIEW
https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
36 matches
Mail list logo
