On 20/09/15 11:46, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno ven 11 set 2015 alle 12:09, James ha scritto:
>>> No time to upload the LilyDev4 iso today, sorry. I'll be back in 10 days.
>>>
>>
>> I'd suggest that if you are not using the appropriate OTF enabled package
>> from teh repos,
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
September 23rd.
PUSH:
4609 Move \once action from iterators to listeners - David Kastrup
[1]https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4609/
Il giorno ven 11 set 2015 alle 12:09, James ha scritto:
No time to upload the LilyDev4 iso today, sorry. I'll be back in 10
days.
I'd suggest that if you are not using the appropriate OTF enabled
package from teh repos, that you create the .fonts dir and put them
there for
James Lowe writes:
> On 20/09/15 22:52, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> On 20.09.2015 23:10, James Lowe wrote:
>>>
>>> My thinking is like this; I pick an issue to work on, I do some stuff,
>>> make a patch, have a discussion, then get bored and go silent.
>>>
>>> The issue is now
Hello,
As part of the 'Patch Meister's' role, I present the following list of
all issues currently marked as 'patch_abandoned'.
I've grouped them into their patch 'Status' fields and then shown the
date that the last time the issue was updated.
For those that cannot remember,
James Lowe writes:
>Hello,
>As part of the 'Patch Meister's' role, I present the following list of
>all issues currently marked as 'patch_abandoned'.
>I've grouped them into their patch 'Status' fields and then shown the
>date that the last time the issue was
Hello,
On 20/09/15 15:01, David Kastrup wrote:
> James Lowe writes:
>
>>Hello,
>>As part of the 'Patch Meister's' role, I present the following list of
>>all issues currently marked as 'patch_abandoned'.
>>I've grouped them into their patch 'Status' fields and then
On 20.09.2015 23:10, James Lowe wrote:
My thinking is like this; I pick an issue to work on, I do some stuff,
make a patch, have a discussion, then get bored and go silent.
The issue is now patch_abandoned.
What is the benefit of leaving this label (or even having it in the
first place)
One
On 20/09/15 22:52, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 20.09.2015 23:10, James Lowe wrote:
>>
>> My thinking is like this; I pick an issue to work on, I do some stuff,
>> make a patch, have a discussion, then get bored and go silent.
>>
>> The issue is now patch_abandoned.
>>
>> What is the benefit of
not exactly abandoned, just needs-work since more than three years:
http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/2474/
I forgot I was waiting for feedback, as I believe I answered all
raised concerns.
p
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo