> The tie interface has height-limit and ratio as part of Tie.details.
>
> The slur interface has height-limit and ratio as part of Slur (not
> embedded in Slur.details).
>
> Is there a reason for this difference, or is it just due to never
> making the two be consistent?
I believe it's the latte
The tie interface has height-limit and ratio as part of Tie.details.
The slur interface has height-limit and ratio as part of Slur (not
embedded in Slur.details).
Is there a reason for this difference, or is it just due to never making
the two be consistent? If there is no reason for the differe
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> According to the Internals Reference, scriptDefinitions is an internal
> context property, meaning that the user should not change it.
>
> Why is this so? As far as I can see, scriptDefinitions is not defined
> during engraving, but during i
According to the Internals Reference, scriptDefinitions is an internal
context property, meaning that the user should not change it.
Why is this so? As far as I can see, scriptDefinitions is not defined
during engraving, but during initialization. So it ought to be
user-settable, it seems to me.
On 2016/05/24 23:57:38, Carl wrote:
The challenge is that some of the feta font elements in the scripts.*
familiy
are used as articulations, while others (e.g. caesura) are not. And
the ones
not used as articulations are not included in script.scm by choice.
I guess my wording was bad.
Reviewers: thomasmorley651,
Message:
It seems to me that if we want to make this kind of a regtest we should
really be looking at all TextScripts that are supposed to be
articulations, and seeing if the articulations work.
The regtest you proposed looks at all the articulations we have defined,
James writes:
> David
>
> On 24/05/16 18:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>> James Lowe writes:
>>
>>> No core file was generated, I also upped the ulimit to 1GB.
>>>
>>> So perhaps it isn't the type of 'assertion' or crash you thought it
>>> was after all?
>> Perhaps. Knut's problem, however, sounded
David
On 24/05/16 18:20, David Kastrup wrote:
James Lowe writes:
No core file was generated, I also upped the ulimit to 1GB.
So perhaps it isn't the type of 'assertion' or crash you thought it
was after all?
Perhaps. Knut's problem, however, sounded like it. If you have
different results
David
On 24/05/16 18:20, David Kastrup wrote:
James Lowe writes:
No core file was generated, I also upped the ulimit to 1GB.
So perhaps it isn't the type of 'assertion' or crash you thought it
was after all?
Perhaps. Knut's problem, however, sounded like it. If you have
different results
James Lowe writes:
> No core file was generated, I also upped the ulimit to 1GB.
>
> So perhaps it isn't the type of 'assertion' or crash you thought it
> was after all?
Perhaps. Knut's problem, however, sounded like it. If you have
different results from Knut, things are even muddier than I t
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
May 27th.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
__
Push:
4850 Remove self method bindings of translator groups - David
11 matches
Mail list logo