Re: make website fails first time on multithreaded build

2017-03-26 21:08 GMT+02:00 Francisco Vila : > Hello, I am having problems trying to build the website as if it were > the first time; subsequent tries do work and the build finishes > successfully. > > However, the options CPU_COUNT=1 and -j1 work well even at first time. >

make website fails first time on multithreaded build

Hello, I am having problems trying to build the website as if it were the first time; subsequent tries do work and the build finishes successfully. However, the options CPU_COUNT=1 and -j1 work well even at first time. The error seems to be here: /usr/bin/python -tt

Re: Can't post via gmane, and trouble subscribing

Hi James, On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:07 AM, James wrote: > Well as far as I am aware gmane is still under going 'new ownership' > and looking at the http://home.gmane.org/ blog from the new owners, > there hasn't been anything significant announced/updated for a few > months, so it

[guile-2.2] threads

Hi all, guile-2.2 prints a warning, if module (ice-9 threads) is not imported. (This does not happen with guile-1.8 or guile-2.0) Import (ice-9 threads) to have access to `call-with-new-thread'. Import (ice-9 threads) to have access to `current-thread'. As suggested by Arne Babenhauserheide from

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 13:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Thomas Morley writes: >>> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :

Re: Can't post via gmane, and trouble subscribing

James writes: > Hello Jeffery, > > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:27:31 -0400 > Jeffery Shivers wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is the gmane server actually down, or is it just me? >> >> This link: >> http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look.

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> >>> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look. >> >> How to proceed? >> Upload a fixed patch for review?

Re: Can't post via gmane, and trouble subscribing

Hello Jeffery, On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:27:31 -0400 Jeffery Shivers wrote: > Hi, > > Is the gmane server actually down, or is it just me? > > This link: > http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel > ... provided here: >

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:53:19 +0200 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > >> 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> After 5099 was

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > >> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look. > > How to proceed? > Upload a fixed patch for review? Probably. > I'm terribly sorry for the additional work for you

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. > Obviously I need more coffee ... > > 2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Am 26. März 2017 10:59:03 MESZ schrieb Thomas Morley : >Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. >Obviously I need more coffee ... > Yep. "Sometimes I make me a coffee in the morning - but usually coffee makes *me*. ___

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. Obviously I need more coffee ... 2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue >> 5099 was. > > That would be a rather

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : >>> Hello >>> >>> After 5099 was pushed I am now seeing problems with basic 'make'. > >> >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue >> 5099 was. > > That would be a rather difficult feat (you don't do things like that > "accidentally" with Git

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue > 5099 was. That would be a rather difficult feat (you don't do things like that "accidentally" with Git since you have to work very hard to do them, with a set of very

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : >> Hello >> >> After 5099 was pushed I am now seeing problems with basic 'make'. > > accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue 5099 > was. > But I had it as