k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Werner:
>> >> "taking care of PostScript" is not related to converting LilyPond's
>> >> graphics internals to Cairo since LilyPond's graphics internals are
>> >> not written in PostScript.
>> >
>> > Ok, forget it then, you are not listening. [...]
>>
>> Why such a
Folks,
the author of pdfsizeopt
https://github.com/pts/pdfsizeopt
has recently applied some bug fixes to make it work with lilypond
documentation files (cf. https://github.com/pts/pdfsizeopt/issues/11).
Using trueroad's approach (i.e., using `extractpdfmark'),
`lilypond-notation.pdf'
Is there a 64 bit OS X version of the lilypond application? If not, is
there any reason for that?
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
As the maintainer of LilyBin, I'll be interested in knowing if you
encounter any issues, especially with reliability of the service! Last
year, I and another developer did some work to get LilyBin running on AWS
Lambda especially to handle the load of classroom situations where many
people use are
Werner:
> >> "taking care of PostScript" is not related to converting LilyPond's
> >> graphics internals to Cairo since LilyPond's graphics internals are
> >> not written in PostScript.
> >
> > Ok, forget it then, you are not listening. [...]
>
> Why such a hostile tone, Karl? There is no
>> "taking care of PostScript" is not related to converting LilyPond's
>> graphics internals to Cairo since LilyPond's graphics internals are
>> not written in PostScript.
>
> Ok, forget it then, you are not listening. [...]
Why such a hostile tone, Karl? There is no reason for this.
I have
David Kastrup:
> k...@aspodata.se writes:
> > David Kastrup:
...
> "taking care of PostScript" is not related to converting LilyPond's
> graphics internals to Cairo since LilyPond's graphics internals are not
> written in PostScript.
Ok, forget it then, you are not listening.
...
> When
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> David Kastrup:
>> k...@aspodata.se writes:
>>
>> > Han-Wen Nienhuys:
>> >> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> ...
>> > If no one else like to care for postscript, I can step in to handle it.
>>
>> I don't know what that means.
>
>
David Kastrup:
> k...@aspodata.se writes:
>
> > Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> >> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
...
> > If no one else like to care for postscript, I can step in to handle it.
>
> I don't know what that means.
It's like english, I am willing to take
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys:
>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > What does that mean? Mainly a viable migration strategy where we might
>> > be able to drop catering for a whole lot of graphics programming
>> > ourselves by introducing a
Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > What does that mean? Mainly a viable migration strategy where we might
> > be able to drop catering for a whole lot of graphics programming
> > ourselves by introducing a dependency on Cairo. I am not
David Kastrup:
...
> The main question mark would concern font handling
> but I think it integrates with FreeType as well as Pango.
...
cairo has support for freetype
https://cairographics.org/manual/cairo-FreeType-Fonts.html
pango has support for cairo:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> What does that mean? Mainly a viable migration strategy where we might
>> be able to drop catering for a whole lot of graphics programming
>> ourselves by introducing a
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> What does that mean? Mainly a viable migration strategy where we might
> be able to drop catering for a whole lot of graphics programming
> ourselves by introducing a dependency on Cairo. I am not overly
what "catering for
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> The first step would likely just involve moving to Cairo data
>> structures while keeping most of the current code except where the
>> code would duplicate Cairo API calls in a reasonably straightforward
>> way.
>
> Sounds very sensible. Looking around
> The first step would likely just involve moving to Cairo data
> structures while keeping most of the current code except where the
> code would duplicate Cairo API calls in a reasonably straightforward
> way.
Sounds very sensible. Looking around for other PDF generation
libraries, we don't
Hi folks,
last time I looked at Cairo, its PDF generation was not really suitable
for use in LilyPond. I have now updated my Cairo repository and saw
that there are commits for its PDF backend supporting hyperlinks,
document outlines, document metadata as of last October.
What does that mean?
17 matches
Mail list logo