Hi Federico,
Yes, I can generalise this to Linux not just Ubuntu.
There are bound to be mistakes in it!
Andrew
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 16:31, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> I wanted to test your tutorial but I haven't had any spare time so far.
> I hope I'll have it soon.
> I noticed some
Il giorno mer 27 feb 2019 alle 0:31, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
There's been a lot of long discussion about how to get gvim going with
point and click lately. I finally achieved this, but found the NR
missing
important information, and to be ever so slightly in error. To that, I
wrote a
From: Andrew Bernard
Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 8:18 PM
To: Carl Sorensen
Cc: Devel
Subject: Re: Gvim point and click guide
Hi Carl,
Some interlineated comments.
Should I just make this a tutorial on Scores of Beauty? But it seems very
integral to lilypond to me, and many people
Hi Carl,
Some interlineated comments.
Should I just make this a tutorial on Scores of Beauty? But it seems very
integral to lilypond to me, and many people stumble over this.
Andrew
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 11:48, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/19, 4:32 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of
On 2/26/19, 4:32 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Andrew Bernard"
wrote:
There's been a lot of long discussion about how to get gvim going with
point and click lately. I finally achieved this, but found the NR missing
important information, and to be ever so slightly in error. To
There's been a lot of long discussion about how to get gvim going with
point and click lately. I finally achieved this, but found the NR missing
important information, and to be ever so slightly in error. To that, I
wrote a fully fleshed out howto page on what to do. I posted it to the user
group,
Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb James Lowe :
>
> Harm
>
>
> On 26/02/2019 00:12:41, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> after running the regtests the file
> `lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/index.html` is created.
> Opening it in a browser the very first line is:
>
On 2/26/2019 12:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
It wouldn't allow for using XCode in any form on anything but Apple
hardware.
Oh, right. That forestalls the "hackintosh" and Virtual Machine
possibilities. Thanks for the clarification.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
On 2/26/2019 11:59 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Aren't there any exceptions for DLLs? On OSX, you normally don't do
statical linking...
If LilyPond was built with XCode on macOS, I expect Apple would be
perfectly happy except for App Store.
The whole business of dissecting XCode and hauling
Karlin High writes:
> On 2/26/2019 11:59 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Aren't there any exceptions for DLLs? On OSX, you normally don't do
>> statical linking...
>
> If LilyPond was built with XCode on macOS,
On Apple hardware.
> I expect Apple would be perfectly happy except for App Store.
>
>> If we link with Apple libraries, we also need to heed the licensing
>> conditions of the Apple libraries. Do they stand for this?
>
> I gather Apple licenses have changed over time. Possibly older
> versions of their software were better-aligned with GNU
> expectations. I expect this
On 2/26/2019 4:23 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
If we link with Apple libraries, we also need to heed the licensing
conditions of the Apple libraries. Do they stand for this?
I gather Apple licenses have changed over time. Possibly older versions
of their software were better-aligned with GNU
Harm
On 26/02/2019 00:12:41, Thomas Morley
wrote:
Hi,
after running the regtests the file
`lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/index.html` is created.
Opening it in a browser the very first line is:
click to filter rows by type: ly / profiling / signature / midi /
log / gittxt
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 2/25/19, 5:25 PM, "Karlin High" wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2019 10:44 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > A further look into PureDarwin's website shows that many of the
> > Darwin utilities in fact link to closed-source Apple libraries.
> >
> > So probably we
> On 26 Feb 2019, at 01:19, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2019 1:22 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> I have just installed it, and it is 64 bit
>
> Curious, does the 64-bit resolve the out-of-memory errors that have been
> appearing in 32-bit versions? This thread, for example:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
