Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Flaming Hakama by Elaine
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:34 PM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > > In fact, one of the reasons I have not tried Frescobaldi is that you need > > to use a package manager to install it, and download the developer tools > > (XCode). > > You do? I just download the bi

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 9 Mar 2019, at 18:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Thanks for testing it! You are welcome! >> I made a standalone version using 'port mdmg lilypond-devel' which >> results in a lilypond-devel-2.19.82_4.dmg, on MacOS 10.13.6, and it >> is working after installing: I moved my /opt/ out of way

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Thanks for testing it! > I made a standalone version using 'port mdmg lilypond-devel' which > results in a lilypond-devel-2.19.82_4.dmg, on MacOS 10.13.6, and it > is working after installing: I moved my /opt/ out of way, and it > gets installed in a new directory /opt/. It is rather large thoug

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 9 Mar 2019, at 08:40, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I've just remembered that the MacPorts man page of the `port' > packaging manager shows the following. > > PACKAGING ACTIONS >There are also actions for producing installable packages of >ports: > ... >mdmg >Creates an In

Doc: CG - Minor updates to 3.4.9 - Commit access (issue 566540043 by pkxgnugi...@runbox.com)

2019-03-09 Thread thomasmorley65
It's too long I had to follow those lines, thus I can't say anything to your changes. One nit: https://codereview.appspot.com/566540043/diff/566530044/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/566540043/

Re: Doc: NR 4.2.2 - remove deprecated @knownissue (issue 550530043 by pkxgnugi...@runbox.com)

2019-03-09 Thread lilypond
On 2019/03/09 15:47:38, lilypond-pkx wrote: On 2019/03/09 11:13:18, Malte Meyn wrote: > Could this be done for all other languages (de, es, fr, it, ja) too or should > that be left to the translators? Done. LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/550530043/ _

Re: Doc: NR 4.2.2 - remove deprecated @knownissue (issue 550530043 by pkxgnugi...@runbox.com)

2019-03-09 Thread pkxgnugitcl
On 2019/03/09 11:13:18, Malte Meyn wrote: Could this be done for all other languages (de, es, fr, it, ja) too or should that be left to the translators? Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/550530043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Karlin High
On 3/8/2019 12:34 PM, Jacques Menu wrote: The English version link at the bottom left leads to a 404. Archive.org to the rescue. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA ___ lilypond-

Doc: NR 4.2.2 - remove deprecated @knownissue (issue 550530043 by pkxgnugi...@runbox.com)

2019-03-09 Thread lilypond
Could this be done for all other languages (de, es, fr, it, ja) too or should that be left to the translators? https://codereview.appspot.com/550530043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno ven 8 mar 2019 alle 19:14, Hans =?iso-8859-1?b?xWJlcmc=?= ha scritto: I think too that it might be better to switch to say Frescobaldi as the official LilyPond editor if you need one, though I haven't used it. Their site is only in Dutch from what I could see, which might be a turnof

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno ven 8 mar 2019 alle 22:16, David Kastrup ha scritto: If I remember correctly, Frescobaldi can download and install official LilyPond versions. If that's also the case in MacOSX, that would be a strong reason to try providing a no-GUI LilyPond installation for Darwin. This was possi

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

2019-03-09 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 9 Mar 2019, at 08:40, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I've just remembered that the MacPorts man page of the `port' > packaging manager shows the following. ... > I haven't tried this (and I probably won't in the very near future due > to time constraints – on my macOS 10.7.5 I have to compile ev