Here is the current countdown report.
The next countdown will begin on September 5th.
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
No patches in Push at this time.
Countdown:
!1593 Add
On Sep 2, 2022, at 04:42, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Does C++ provide tools for making this simpler? I'm thinking that something
> like
>
> LY_DEFINE (ly_grob_relative_coordinate, ..., (Grob *g, Grob *refp, Axis a),
> ...)
> {
> ...
> return ret;
> }
>
> would be equivalent to
>
>
Le 02/09/2022 à 13:17, Dan Eble a écrit :
On Sep 2, 2022, at 04:42, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Does C++ provide tools for making this simpler? I'm thinking that something like
LY_DEFINE (ly_grob_relative_coordinate, ..., (Grob *g, Grob *refp, Axis a), ...)
{
...
return ret;
}
would be
Hi,
Right now, the most common pattern for a LY_DEFINE is somewhat repetitive:
LY_DEFINE (ly_name, "ly:name",
req, opt, var, (SCM arg1, SCM arg2, ...),
R"(doc...)")
{
LY_ASSERT_TYPE (is_scm (arg1), 1);
Cpp_type arg1_cpp = from_scm (arg1);
auto *const smob =
