Here is the current countdown report.
The next countdown will begin on November 4th.
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
!1701 Tuplet-related cleanups - Jean Abou Samra
Le 02/11/2022 à 16:19, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
OK, thanks. I wonder how the heuristics could be improved. Given
that a lyric hyphen must be preceded by whitespace, while normally
`--` as an articulation is following a non-whitespace character, maybe
a look-behind assertion for the latter
>> ```
>> c''4-3 e-5 b-2 a-1
>> ```
>>
>> which Pygments translates to
>>
>> ```
>> @t{c''} @t{4} @t{-3} @t{e} @t{-5} @t{b} @t{-2} @t{a} @t{-1}
>> ```
>>
>> that is, the `-` is not typeset in bold.
>
> Because "-3" could just as well be a number rather than a fingering,
> and it's hard to guess.
Le 02/11/2022 à 14:53, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
The above example was the wrong one, sorry. What I actually wanted to
show are inconsistencies. In the same section you can find
```
c''4-3 e-5 b-2 a-1
```
which Pygments translates to
```
@t{c''} @t{4} @t{-3} @t{e} @t{-5} @t{b} @t{-2} @t{a}
>> While working on the LM I see the following example in section 4.1.3:
>> ```
>> \new Staff {
>> \relative {
>> r4 g'8 g c4 c8 d |
>> e4 r8
>> <<
>> { f8 c c }
>> \new Staff { f8 f c }
>> >>
>> r4 |
>> }
>> }
>> ```
>> I now wonder why the last two notes of
On 2022-11-02 4:42 am, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
While working on the LM I see the following example in section 4.1.3:
```
\new Staff {
\relative {
r4 g'8 g c4 c8 d |
e4 r8
<<
{ f8 c c }
\new Staff { f8 f c }
>>
r4 |
}
}
```
I now wonder why the last two notes
>> Please have a look at the attached image; it's taken from the LM,
>> chapter 3.1.4. As can be seen, `_` and `-` are bold, and `^`
>> isn't. Is it possible to make `_` and `-` bold only if used as
>> articulation (i.e., *after* `[_^-]`)?
>
> The relevant part of the output generated by
While working on the LM I see the following example in section 4.1.3:
```
\new Staff {
\relative {
r4 g'8 g c4 c8 d |
e4 r8
<<
{ f8 c c }
\new Staff { f8 f c }
>>
r4 |
}
}
```
I now wonder why the last two notes of the temporary (lower) staff
don't have a
Le 02/11/2022 à 12:02, Federico Bruni a écrit :
Il giorno mer 2 nov 2022 alle 00:12:07 +0100, Jean Abou Samra
ha scritto:
Your patch to Guile disables recompilation with a "return 1;"
at the end of the function but keeps the logic of the check and
the messages. Just additionally remove the
Il giorno mer 2 nov 2022 alle 00:12:07 +0100, Jean Abou Samra
ha scritto:
Your patch to Guile disables recompilation with a "return 1;"
at the end of the function but keeps the logic of the check and
the messages. Just additionally remove the code just above the line
it's touching, or add
10 matches
Mail list logo
