On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:24:23PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I did look, but in the end it was easier to find the problem by
looking at what happened in make dist.
Documentation/lang/GNUmakefile has a line like:
SUBDIRS = essay learning notation texidocs usage web extending included
which
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:18:02PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
OK -as remarked in my previous mail patchy-merge fails with:
I currently have no idea why this is.
ok, I'll try running it.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:37:44PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 13.02.2012 um 13:36 schrieb Graham Percival:
Should I tune osx-lilypad-universal-0.6.tar.gz to be compatible with GUB's
installer.py?
Anyway, here is a patched version:
http://klarinett.li/lilypond/osx-lilypad
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:40:54PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
ERROR: ld.so: object
'/home/gub/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/librestrict.so' from
LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
hmm.
Command barfed: tar -C /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-x86/installer
-zxf
What happens when you run this
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
See my pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/gperciva/lilypad/pull/1
Pulled, and I've made you a collaborator, so presumably you can
push directly to that repo now.
- Graham
___
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:37:44PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
Anyway, here is a patched version:
http://klarinett.li/lilypond/osx-lilypad-universal-0.6.1.tar.gz
Thanks, uploaded to lilypond.org in the usual place.
I've made you a collaborator for the GUB repo so you can push a
change to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 $2 21
Actually, it is totally basic shell scripting here.
Well, apparently you don't need basic shell scripting for 7
years of full-time linux use and 4 years of macosx use, and
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 11.02.2012 um 19:57 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
Yes, and I'm aware of that two-line fix. It gives ppc support, but I
think it also gives a bad version of LilyPond when the About menu item is
checked. I may be wrong on this.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:22PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
My rule of thumb is that if I don't understand something easily,
then at least 50% of future lilypond contributors won't understand
it either.
eval is ugly and a little
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:46:01PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Images should be pushed along other changes, and also to our branch.
Graham has to authorize something afterwards for those to be visible.
Forwarding to
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:47:36PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Automatic footnotes take three arguments; the @var{Layout Object} to be
annotated, the @var{(x . y)} position of the indicator and a
The texinfo manual says:
Use the @var command to indicate metasyntactic variables and so it
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:03:48PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2) Adding comprehensive MusicXML import and export features, together
with test suites for it. Requirements: ? (no idea in which language
this would be written), MusicXML, basic LilyPond and music notation
knowledge; familiarity
I've forked the GUB repo so I can easily give push access to
people like Mike:
https://github.com/gperciva/gub
The CG has been updated.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2012/2/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
In order to try to track this down, I'd like to have a git history to see
how things have changed. [...]
Can anybody tell me where I might find an up-to-date repository?
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypad
As of 2012 Feb 12, this is the latest
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:05:31PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypad
I knew I forgot something. :(
I have renamed the macos-lilypad branch on savannah to:
archive/macos-lilypad
Please do not pull or fetch to that branch. I was reluctant to
delete it entirely
In case it's not totally obvious, don't push anything to an
archive/ branch. I've renamed a few old branches that might
mislead people, namely:
web- archive/web
web-gop- archive/web-gop
macos-lilypad - archive/macos-lilypad
- Graham
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
When make doc is run, it complains about 3 missing directories -
Documentation/hu/included; Documentation/cs/included and
Documentation/zh/included. We could add these to the list of known
missing directories in
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 04:13:42PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: extract-texi-filenames
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/2/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
In order to try to track this down, I'd like to have a git history to see
how things have changed. [...]
Can anybody tell me where I might find an up-to-date repository?
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
W dniu 11 lutego 2012 13:33 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
Time+effort required to write a proposal. Would you be happy
delaying the 2.16 for, say, a month, while we spend effort writing
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
However, there is clearly no desire to
actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing support is
the thing to do.
Again: I don't have a clue about the involved work. But if it
Does anybody feel like submitting a proposal to google summer of
code? IIRC students must be registered at a school, so this isn't
something that would help any senior developer, but it's still
$5500 for any student that ends up working on lilypond over the
summer, plus $500 for the organization.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:24:38PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Are the results available anywhere?
Not publicly, no. If I can find the password for an old gmail
account from like 5 years ago, I can check them.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:38:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
Ooh. I think I qualify - I'm officially a full-time student. I'd be
happy to share the bounty...
I should be surprised if that is even permitted. Of course, it is
unlikely that they
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:19:18PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I'm a student and i'd love to spend my summer working on LilyPond.
The question is, do you think i qualify?
I think so. Read their FAQ. It all comes down to whether you're
registered at an accredited university (or IIRC high
It might be nice to have a release later today, as there are 5
Critical fixes either pushed or waiting to be pushed.
Unfortunately,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7
shows some issues which do *not* contain fixed_2_15_29, so I
will not make a release.
In case you forgot, the
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:13:53AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
Those are all patches which only actually appear in 15.29
Then label them as fixed_2_15_29.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:22:44AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
It is usually the responsibility of the person marking the issue fixed
to also add the fixed_xx_xx label and mention the commit, but if that
has not been done for some reason, I think we have keeping this info
somewhat accurate
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:06PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
The reason I was suggesting an early push was that cleaning up make
doc is a cumulative affair, and I find it easier to manage
changes/patches if I don't have multiple differences from master in
my build system. I'd like to get one
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:29:00PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
So I looked into the National Endowment for the Arts and the
National Endowment for the Humanities.
I could see this funding Americans to work on lilypond programming
while living in America.
I could see this potentially funding
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:11:26PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 2/8/12 11:01 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I can not see this funding non-Americans working outside of
America.
If you look at the links, many of the successful grants either invite or
require
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:51:24AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one
remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of
that. I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the other remote branches do
not appear, and i
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:12:55PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Errors in examples
Users
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:45:47PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In my opinion, these times are too high to justify the gain that one
gets from using fine-tuned vertical skylines.
Yes, unfortunately.
+1
is it at all possible to make this a user-configurable option?
I know this would add
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:43:49AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
for some reason unfathomable to me, the staging patchy contains the
following code in compile_lilypond_test.py:
The intent is that after doing staging-master, patchy's master
should be updated so that a later run of test-patches.py
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:31:52AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
The intent is that after doing staging-master, patchy's master
should be updated so that a later run of test-patches.py doesn't
miss any updates.
If test-patches.py needs
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:36:47AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
The windows welcome.ly points users to http://lilypond.org/web/help
which (I think) is an old implementation of the website, with old
look and feel. There doesn't appear to be an identical page in the
new website, but pointing them
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:15:31PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling ?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/pushing-to-staging ?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/commits-and-patches
?
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:43:45PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
In the source for http://lilypond.org/ly-examples/tab-example.png I
get the following compile errors:
Seems to me these really ought to compile clean?
Users aren't supposed to look at these, but sure, go ahead and fix
those
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
If I maker a change to a manual (in this case, notation; winds) and
this has translations, should I make the same change into the
translations, or leave it to be picked up by the translators later?
Leave it.
- Graham
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
2012/2/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Hardly surprising. From changes.tely:
@item
Flags are now treated as separate objects rather than as stem parts.
@lilypond[fragment,quote,relative=2]
\override Flag #'color = #red
g8
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:57:24AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've not looked at the attached file, but what were you trying to do
and what caused problems, Jan?
a) git management. test-patches.py basically takes whatever state its
reference
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 02:14:56PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
* git clone learned --single-branch option to limit cloning to a
single branch (surprise!).
This might change things end be quite useful!
Thanks for the news, but in this case it's actually the opposite:
we _want_
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:10:51PM +, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi:270: make -f website.make
WEBSITE_ONLY_BUILD=1 -B website
If we leave -B here, does it fix issue 2251?
That's not the issue; once I'd boiled down the instructions and
tested
Now that the Patchy staging-merge is running ok, it's time to
force the next issue:
I will not be making any more releases, stable or unstable,
as long as there are issues to verify relating to a
previously-released version.
At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:56:06AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
in the list of critical issues the recent issue 2271
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2271 is the
only one I see without an obvious path forward.
A quick glance at
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:14:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
At the time of this writing, this means that if *ANY* issue on this
list:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7
does *NOT* say fixed_2_15_28
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:14:41PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Programmers gives things fixed_* tags.
You wish.
Heh. Normative vs. descriptive. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
Looks like Dave has marked all the outstanding fixes as verified while I was
busy testing 1416.
almost; there's still 2149.
My understanding is that they still all need to be tested. I'm travelling
from Saturday but I'll try to
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:00:30AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I got a Permission denied (publickey) message from patchy when
trying to fiddle with it. I know that it is going to the
correct directory because it succeeds in deleting the test
branch but then it gives me this. Any
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:41:22AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:00:30AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I got a Permission denied (publickey) message from patchy when
trying to fiddle
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:55:24AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
My draft instructions, based on my memory of what I did.
Looks good! Here's a few little notes, including the reason why I
couldn't test David's 2040 patch.
(coincidently, I'm waiting for my supervisor to show up, so I
spent 10
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:03:17PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: New Patchy thread
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
OK - I've now
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:37:33PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I assume I need to do something to update my git repo. However,
it's vanilla and created using lily-git, so we would need
instructions on how to do this anyway. Anyone know what's needed?
I'll bet you a tenner that you used the OLD
The updated CG instructions for setting up git manually specify to
use clone:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/setting-up
but the latest patch for lily-git.tcl still appears to use the old
git remote add... stuff to only get specific branches?
If I understand git correctly,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:47:52PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
There you go. That seemed to work.
Yep, looks good.
I assume all I need to do is run patchy-staging daily?
Yes and no. Running it daily would be great. Running it every 12
hours might be nicer, although maybe you could alternate
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
operator-friendly, i.e.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
defined starting point not relying on whatever happens to be checked out
in the main
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:59:57PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Don't get confused here. Don't scare people away from doing the
staging-merge by talking about test-patches.py.
I am not sure what the problem is with anybody else running
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:07:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
smtp_command: msmtp -C ~/.msmtp-patchy -t means nothing to me.
That is command for mailing the completion message somewhere. I have no
idea what msmtp is supposed to be,
ah yes, I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:35:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:50PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The problem is that the file in question is stencil.hh.
I got around it by using Drul_arraySCM and having the drul
arrayed populated with smobified stencils.
I hope that my
6e2e1d6a13aba88a3a8eecc0d46f96ad245c152a
didn't
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:39:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
My other current concern is to wonder whether lots of people trying to
get patchy running might not collide with each other.
I don't think so; once the first set of commits were pushed to
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 06:56:08PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/30 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
that's ALREADY how it works for the staging-merge.
I guess i mean something different than you do when i say everything
gets done automatically.
I think there's confusion
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:34:45PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Patchy has been running for about 6 hours on my laptop trying to get the
current staging (which is one trivial commit ahead of master) checked.
And is still on it.
??? if you look in the build dir, what logs does it have? I
mean,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 04:18:00AM -0800, lilypond.patchy.gra...@gmail.com
wrote:
*** FAILED BUILD ***
nice make test -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
Previous good commit: 05efb98f2e3ff68f4bb8221db640b0174bfcde93
Current broken commit: b445e1b4207996eee2362187fa3e8b8af8ff05ba
there's an improved git-cl on my github account now:
https://github.com/gperciva/git-cl
Thanks to Lukasz Czerwinski, it tracks all lilypond patches with
the same base url.
http://codereview.appspot.com/search?base=http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git/trunk/
All contributors are
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:31:04AM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 04:18:00AM -0800, lilypond.patchy.gra...@gmail.com
wrote:
make[1]: *** [out-test/tex-fragment.tex] Error 1
make[1
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:07:12AM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks. Are there known issues about running multiple lilypond-book
instances in parallel when they touch the same files? I'm guessing
this is what's going on because a lot of the test files input the same
snippets as example, which
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:18:03AM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
I'll have to test again with -j3, sorry. I suggest we erase the last
two commits from staging until this is resolved. The convert-ly commit
should be pretty safe.
oh, I did that an hour ago, and Patchy's finished merging it now.
-
Since we didn't have any patches on the official countdown for
next Sunday (2pm GST), let's add Carl's latest Critical fix:
empty strings: tabStaff insists on stringnumbers and looses notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256
http://codereview.appspot.com/5576053
- Graham
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:33:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
a) feature freeze. Nothing added that requires documentation changes.
why bother? the two-week release candidate takes care of this.
b) get rid of all critical issues
yes
c) release candidate(s)
yes
d) proofread the docs
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:57:43PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 22/01/2012 2:58 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks, you're quite right CPU is not the limiting factor for the build.
Disk access and usage of swap when compiling
input/regression/collated-files slows down the build to a crawl for me.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:10:16AM +, James wrote:
Initialized empty Git repository in
/home/james/Desktop/patchy/lilypond-autobuild/.git/
fatal: attempt to fetch/clone from a shallow repository
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
It wants to have a full
git clone
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:01:50AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
1) Create an e-mail address contrib...@lilypond.org (this I can't
do - can someone please do this).
Can't do.
Seems simple, effective, and startable in the next two weeks. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but LilyPond is not
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:38:21AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:24:40 +, Graham Percival wrote:
Check your email archives for our discussion on 2011 Dec 2 for all
the reasons I think this is a bad idea.
Given that several users have already expressed
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/25 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Check your email archives for our discussion on 2011 Dec 2 for all
the reasons I think this is a bad idea.
Sorry, but i'm searching for 10 minutes and haven't found relevant
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:29:51PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
That would be the 2240 work. I did a full make check and a build of the
info documentation which in my experience is pretty much the same as a
make doc but somewhat faster.
If it wasn't a build from scratch, it doesn't count.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:09:25PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
There are already existing free software umbrella organizations that
do this: one is SPI[1], another SFC[2].
Yes, I've considered suggesting (after Valentin suggested it to
me) that we might want to approach SFC, but it hasn't been
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
WTF? That's definitely something in the changes file. I checked this
and it compiled and I had code that made sure it compiled. With all the
rebasing to make this fit better I must have displaced the relevant
commit that
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:29:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I would want to avoid
the situation where I have money on my hand I can't spend in good
conscience.
In that case, only accept transfers which you feel cover existing
work (provided the sender realizes this), or transfers which are
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:35:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
has less potential to go wrong if there is a problem at any time. I
actually don't really understand why we bother with restoring the tree
anyway instead of removing it and doing the next test from a freshly
created
git clone
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:50:13AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/23 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
why I never *demand*
developers to fix an issue, even if it is one that is really annoying
my ego in almost every score I typeset.
One thing comes to my mind: you are talking
In order to reduce our bus factor[1] -- especially considering the
distinctly non-zero possibility that I'll be gone at the end of
March -- somebody else needs to run the Patchy staging-merge
script. To make this more presssing, I am refusing to run this
script myself after 29 Jan 2012.
[1]
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:27:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Of course, a 96-hour reponse rate isn't precisely fantastic, but
it's a start.
Well - TBH time isn't of the essence as a general rule. Whether a
bug gets added to the tracker in one day or 3 rarely affects the
overall
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:08:21PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
2. it would be good to have something in the CG about Patchy.
...you can do this.
I have 3.5 hours remaining until Jan 29. Given how often we have
emergencies come up, I think I need to reserve my time for those.
If
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:33:28PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 22/01/2012 2:50 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
try:
autoCompile.configure()
autoCompile.patch(patch_filename)
autoCompile.build(quick_make=True,
issue_id=issue_id
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:49:06AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Anybody actually using the music-cause? Inside of LilyPond, the only
appearance (apart from its declaration) would be
/*
ES TODO: This is a temporary fix. Stream_events should not be
aware of music.
*/
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:35:55AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
So please accept my apologies that I can't defend this patch further
today. It does not mean that I am not serious about it, and I
definitely believe that if Graham double-checks the comments on this
patch, he'll find the reason
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:25:39AM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Well, as it turns out, I could not find any version on the website
where those regtests looked normal. It looks like the lilypond-book
regtests had not been checked in a long time.
That's what I suspected.
I also could not be
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:58:09PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
In an old e-mail i've found a link to what looks like Patchy source code
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/blob/master/patches/compile_lilypond_test.py
Correct.
and i'm preparing a patch addressing David's advice, but i
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Ideally you'd create a github account
Done:
janek-warchol
and then I can let you push directly.
No review? I hope i won't screw anything up.
ok, you have push ability
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:43:26PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
One quick question: Patchy checks patches one at a time, doesn't it?
I.e. applies a patch (doesn't commit), tests, unapplies and moves to
another patch?
...
why are you asking this question? Is the source code really
*that* hard
All release-Critical issues have patches which are either on a
current countdown, have been on a previous countdown, or don't
make sense to be on a countdown at all and will thus be pushed in
a few hours.
Unless any problem are found with the current countdown'ing
patches, 2.15.27 release
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:27:00PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I would very much prefer the work on Issue 2240 (aka 2070) to make it
into 2.16. It is a significant API change that should not occur during
a stable release series, and it paves the way for making the music
function work continue
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:02:32PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/21/12 9:45 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
IMO, significant API changes should not happen right before a
release. Version numbers are cheap; why not have 2.18 in March
2012? Backporting is a huge hassle
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:28:15PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
I've already done so locally, and looking at the result of
lilypond-book regtests, we already have new regressions:
ok, good to know!
I'm sure that you've done this already, but make sure that you
actually try those version in
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:05:46AM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
I am not a developer, just a simple user.
But I must say I am a bit disappointed no developer (except Janek)
replied to your e-mail.
And I'm a bit disappointed that you keep on whining about
developers not doing what you want
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:20:09AM -0800, lilypond.patchy.gra...@gmail.com
wrote:
*** FAILED BUILD ***
nice make doc -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
Previous good commit: 11cf086eaba246f043d553a8bafcdbf1b47b9117
Current broken commit: b667b7fe1bf651b7373014204edbe0e68f17326e
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:24:35PM +, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
could we change this (and other similar) prefix so that it doesn't
contain a slash? I mean, change dev/ to dev- or something like that.
The slash confused me a lot, because it's also used to separate a remote
name from
701 - 800 of 5586 matches
Mail list logo
