remove the version number change to 2.15.11, then please push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5312056/diff/1/Documentation/snippets/new/guitar-slides.ly
File Documentation/snippets/new/guitar-slides.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5293053/diff/12001/lily/page-breaking.cc
File lily/page-breaking.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5293053/diff/12001/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode189
lily/page-breaking.cc:189: old.in_note_heights_.begin (),
old.in_note_heights_.end ());
Why are we talking
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5285053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Patchy the autobot will ok this in an hour or so, but please take a
quick look. Not because I think there's any problems, but because it
could bring you up to speed on the new git-cl if you're feeling
confused.
Description:
CG: clarify git-cl and contributor quick start
http://codereview.appspot.com/5240054/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5240054/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#newcode953
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:953:
yes, fine, LGTM, push it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5155045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, thanks so much for cleaning this up!
http://codereview.appspot.com/5244045/diff/1/make/website.make
File make/website.make (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5244045/diff/1/make/website.make#newcode73
make/website.make:73: CREATE_VERSION=python
$(script-dir)/create-version-itexi.py
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5155045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5131045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
tested and looks great.
I'd like to re-iterate the request to move the rietveld comments into
actual comments in the makefiles; they were extremely helpful for me in
reading the patch, so I'd like them to be stored in git.
I agree with everything Trevor said, including pushing after you've
changed it and it compiles.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4839061/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5133043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/5155045/diff/1/Documentation/snippets/new/positioning-multi-measure-rests.ly
File Documentation/snippets/new/positioning-multi-measure-rests.ly
(right):
wait a moment, why are you adding a snippet to git at all? Just fix it
in LSR. Talk to Phil if you don't know how.
Patch rejected, sorry.
(wow, what a disaster the whole LSR thing is!)
http://codereview.appspot.com/5155045/
___
lilypond-devel
the GNUmakefile and texinfo-rules.make look good
http://codereview.appspot.com/5169041/diff/1/Documentation/topdocs/AUTHORS.texi
File Documentation/topdocs/AUTHORS.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5169041/diff/1/Documentation/topdocs/AUTHORS.texi#newcode13
I'll need a github account name from you to enable random pushing to my
git-cl repo.
https://github.com/
I'm not going to picky about applying changes to this repo... although
maybe it's good for me to take a quick peek at whatever you do, given
some of the problems below. :)
the email came through without trouble; the problem is the uploading.
Wait for Janek to do it. I've made issue 1491 release-critical.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5131045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5050046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Looks mostly good. I would have preferred to have the code changes in a
separate patch from the regtest .ly editing, but that's not a major
issue.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5037046/diff/15001/input/regression/stem-tremolo.ly
File input/regression/stem-tremolo.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4839061/diff/7002/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4839061/diff/7002/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode961
LGTM, go ahead and push
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
any chance of rebasing this patch?
http://codereview.appspot.com/224052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Since it has C changes as well, I'd prefer it to go through a countdown.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Not acceptable in current form because it would cause GUB to fail a
build. I suggest an alternate make target for this type of build.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5067042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi#newcode143
Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi:143:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode258
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:258: If you carefully consider
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5038045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/diff/103001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely
File Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/diff/103001/Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely#newcode909
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM. A quick test showed no problems in make doc. I didn't get
pictures in make website, but then I tried make website without the
patch applied, and I still didn't get pictures... evidently I don't have
my desktop set up to create the full website any more. So that's not a
reason to distrust
sounds reasonable to me
http://codereview.appspot.com/5043047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5038044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5019042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, go ahead and push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM. I think this could have been pushed directly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4991044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
sorry, it's a bit unclear if this is a real patch or not, due to
Reitveld screwed-up-ness.
The top of this page states this:
Do _not_, I repeat, do _not_ merge.
I think that's left-over from your previous patch, but I don't know how
to force Rietveld to only display the commit message from
LGTM, not tested compile but I trust James.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4996044/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py
File scripts/lilypond-book.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4996044/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py#newcode677
scripts/lilypond-book.py:677: relative_output_dir =
global_options.output_dir
did you want an
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4956062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LTGM, not tested, but I'm willing to put it up and just see if anything
breaks.
My only qualm is that this takes lang.LANGAUGES, instead of defining a
WEB_LANGUAGES. At the moment they're the same, but somebody might come
in to do a new translation, and we don't want to enable that on the
Good job! I'm not very familiar with the fetafont stuff, but this looks
like exactly the right thing to do. :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM, please push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4967054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/09/02 06:25:59, jan.nieuwenhuizen wrote:
If that works, then why not have
+import langdefs
+langs = [i.code if i.code != 'en' else '' for i in
langdefs.LANGUAGES]
I agree.
Phil, why did you push this patch without implementing this, or at least
responding to Jan to say why you
Looks plausible, but I haven't tested it quite yet. Could we get:
1) update to the make-website.sh portion of the CG, line 249 of
website-work.itexi ?
2) define WEB_LANGS (or something similar) in langdefs.py, then use
those in create-weblinks.itexi.py ?
Once that's done, I'll give it a whirl,
sweet mao that's disgusting. I love it. :)
If you can make doc from scratch, then push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4950053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951047/diff/1/scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py
File scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951047/diff/1/scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py#newcode31
scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py:31: # Unable to find
I see images, but not ly-examples. Are you sure you see ly-examples on
your system?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4963046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
amusingly, I have no trouble compiling the docs without this patch, but
it fails with this patch applied:
/main/src/lilypond/build/out/lybook-db/b5/lily-2dcca534.ly:1097:9:
warning: no viable initial configuration found: may not find good beam
slope
c ees8 f g
Segmentation
http://codereview.appspot.com/4964041/diff/3001/make/website.make
File make/website.make (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4964041/diff/3001/make/website.make#newcode57
make/website.make:57: ### only update this when the language compiles
correctly!
On 2011/08/27 09:55:25, PhilEHolmes
I'm a bit confused about what you're trying to do here (the git-cl
confusion doesn't help). I am also concerned that you're trying to do
complicated build stuff without being able to test it with the **full**
website-only build.
I really, really suggest that you get the full website-only build
Hi Neil,
Are you still working on this? It's been a year.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1855056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
countdown over, please please push so that we can get a better idea of
how many outstanding patches there are.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
depending on how smart git is, it might be good to rebase and upload a
new draft of this patch after
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/
is pushed (currently on a 48-hour countdown)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4940043/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py
File python/book_snippets.py (right):
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, please push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4938044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I have grave doubts about adding a second search box.
1) it makes the top bar uncomfortably squashed in my default web browser
window
2) it requires users to choose which type of search they want to do.
#1 isn't about me forcing my desktop browser preferences on anybody, but
rather I'm making
Yes, definitely do the pushing stuff in a separate patch. But here's an
outline:
1. update with
git pull -r
2. check you only have 1 patch ready with
git status
3. upload your changes with
git push
http://codereview.appspot.com/4898058/
___
On 2011/08/22 12:30:15, Reinhold wrote:
Now, it's clear that lilypond produces .pdf files that are about 0.5-1
mm too
wide. So we now have the proper way to fix #1816
What does 0.5-1mm mean? Is it 0.5 for top/bottom, 1.0 for left/right?
Or does it depend on some random factor? (i.e.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4940043/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py
File python/book_snippets.py (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4940043/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py#oldcode411
python/book_snippets.py:411: if not has_line_width:
This change change be pushed now; it's gone through the
LGTM, but do we still use the -small images for anything else now? I
mean, go ahead and push this, but then please investigate if we still
need the -small images, and if we don't need them, then please remove
them from the build system.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4916041/
Doc part LGTM. I can't speak about the scm / C++ stuff.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/08/18 11:42:13, Reinhold wrote:
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1425: Generate an SSH
@q{rsa} key
pair. Enter the following at the
Why did you change all dsa to rsa? RSA is the older encryption
technology, which
is known not to be as secure as DSA...
Really?! this
LGTM, one suggestion.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4898058/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4898058/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#newcode1574
Thanks so much for looking into this!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py
File python/book_snippets.py (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py#oldcode424
python/book_snippets.py:424: if type == 'lilypond':
This part is only
LGTM; please push after fixing Neil's whitespace concerns.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4891044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4854049/diff/5001/input/regression/completion-heads-factor.ly
File input/regression/completion-heads-factor.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4854049/diff/5001/input/regression/completion-heads-factor.ly#newcode12
On 2011/08/10 05:19:42, Graham Percival wrote:
input/regression/completion-heads-factor.ly:12: \paper {
#(set-paper-size a6)
}
is this part of the compiler warnings patch?
sorry, ignore that, I only just looked at the changelog message.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4854049/
LGTM. My comment is a tiny nitpick; I don't think it needs to hold up
pushing this.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4811066/diff/8003/input/regression/mozart-hrn-3.ly
File input/regression/mozart-hrn-3.ly (right):
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
cannot apply to master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4814041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
cannot apply to master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
sorry, unforutnately this patch cannot be applied to git master due to
fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4807053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
awesome work, I really love this. Unfortunately it cannot apply
directly to git master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4822055/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
patch fails due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4626094/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, fantastic work as always.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4794057/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, although I initially misread the commit message as saying that the
*new* version uses tabs for indents. Maybe change that to the old
version used tabs, just for extra clarity ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4811066/
___
lilypond-devel mailing
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4806050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808051/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808051/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1319
Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1319: In the above example, the
I can't see the diff. Please read:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1491
http://codereview.appspot.com/4819041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Neil,
Please push this; we'd like to get back to 0 Critical issues.
Cheers,
- Graham
http://codereview.appspot.com/4683043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
here's a series of patches for the C++ formatting.
- final (?) set of changes to fixcc.py
- changes to CG
Description:
CG: describe new C++ formatting (GOP-PROP 3)
Adapt fixcc.py to use Astyle
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4760056/
Affected files:
LGTM. Maybe wait a day for Trevor to comment, then push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
could you do a git pull, and then make a new commit for this? I've run
makelsr.py locally.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
you need to do
git add Documentation/snippets/new/*.ly
git commit Documentation/snippets/new/
to get your new files included in this commit.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
On 2011/07/16 21:06:34, Graham Percival wrote:
you need to do
git add Documentation/snippets/new/*.ly
git commit Documentation/snippets/new/
to get your new files included in this commit.
no wait, sorry, ignore that. My eyes (and the sorting order in
rietveld) mislead me.
in light of the growing consensus for combined logfiles for the build
system -- and given that lilypond only produces stuff on stderr and
apparently this isn't going to change -- I wonder if it might be better
to redirect both stdout and sterr to a single .log file.
I'm happy with pushing this
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4675048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/13003/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/13003/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode320
Documentation/web/community.itexi:320: or @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}})}
http://codereview.appspot.com/4668058/diff/1/Documentation/web/manuals.itexi
File Documentation/web/manuals.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4668058/diff/1/Documentation/web/manuals.itexi#newcode129
Documentation/web/manuals.itexi:129: (LSR). User-created snippets that
show a
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode311
Documentation/web/community.itexi:311: Specify which release of LilyPond
LGTM, please push.
(under my seal as Documentation Meister)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4668058/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm in a boring presentation.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode311
Documentation/web/community.itexi:311:
On 2011/07/06 16:33:12, jan.nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On 2011/07/06 14:40:56, Graham Percival wrote:
wait, WTF just happened? We're no longer using astyle, and instead
we'll be
requiring everybody to install emacs?!
Yay! And while everyone has it installed, why not give
it a second (or third)
We need to be careful about adding stuff to the webpage; perfection is
when there's nothing left to remove, not when there's nothing left to
add.
I'm glad that you're working on it! I'm just warning you that there
will be many nitpicks.
On 2011/07/04 21:01:44, Janek Warchol wrote:
2011/7/4 percival.music...@gmail.com:
this won't compile; it would have to be @example instead, and that
will
require
@{ @} escapes.
Umm.. is it right now?
why the mao are you asking me? Cutpaste this and tell me yourself:
cd build/
On 2011/07/03 02:41:15, Carl wrote:
Can you make it possible for us to see the diff caused by applying
this script
to the files you've mentioned?
I'll make a separate git branch showing the output once a few minor
issues are done.
Keith:
1. all // comments are now hard-left (i.e. in column
could you check the permissions or directory of
http://www.holmessoft.co.uk/homepage/private/lilypond/lilygood.lytex
I can't download any of the .lytex files. I can get the .txt files just
fine.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664060/
___
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo