2014-08-01 12:04 GMT+02:00 perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com:
The user interface is simply an optional argument (default 1) in the
font-spec-list. [...]
Ah, so it's up to the user to provide scaling factors. I thought that
there is some code measuring height of the x letter and scaling the
font
On 2014/07/31 20:40:40, janek wrote:
from description:
Furthermore, it implements per-font scaling (e.g., to match the
x-heights
of different fonts used in the document).
This is very nice! Please pardon a stupid question, but i failed to
find which
place in the code is responsible for
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/scm/font.scm
File scm/font.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/scm/font.scm#newcode241
scm/font.scm:241: Construct a font tree consisting of the default Feta
music font and
I think an explanation and clear example
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/scm/font.scm
File scm/font.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/scm/font.scm#newcode285
scm/font.scm:285: (let ((n (make-font-tree-node 'font-encoding
'fetaMusic)))
On 2014/07/24 20:55:54, Mark Polesky wrote:
I'd
from description:
Furthermore, it implements per-font scaling (e.g., to match the
x-heights
of different fonts used in the document).
This is very nice! Please pardon a stupid question, but i failed to
find which place in the code is responsible for this. Could you give me
a pointer?
No
On 07/25/2014 05:55 AM, markpole...@gmail.com wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/input/regression/font-expert-selection.ly
Mark, thanks for the comments. James, give this at least one more
cycle, please. I'll incorporate the changes as soon as I can find the
time,
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/input/regression/font-expert-selection.ly
File input/regression/font-expert-selection.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/80001/input/regression/font-expert-selection.ly#newcode33
On 2014/07/16 17:13:27, J_lowe wrote:
On 2014/07/16 09:20:45, dak wrote:
There is no doc string here or other documentation.
I wrote one now; didn't do it because I started with a copy of
make-pango-font-tree, and it does not have one as well (I know, not
the
best reason).
Is there some
perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
On 2014/07/16 17:13:27, J_lowe wrote:
On 2014/07/16 09:20:45, dak wrote:
There is no doc string here or other documentation.
I wrote one now; didn't do it because I started with a copy of
It is not built into the docs, right?
On 2014/07/17 06:36:20, dak wrote:
mailto:perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
On 2014/07/16 17:13:27, J_lowe wrote:
On 2014/07/16 09:20:45, dak wrote:
There is no doc string here or other documentation.
I wrote one now; didn't do it because I started with a copy of
It is not built
perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
Two follow-up questions:
1.) Is there a way to list all Lily scheme functions and/or all their
docstrings? If you know what function or variable you are looking for,
the docstrings are obviously great. But if I look for something which
matches your
On 2014/07/17 08:28:36, dak wrote:
mailto:perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
Two follow-up questions:
1.) Is there a way to list all Lily scheme functions and/or all
their
docstrings? If you know what function or variable you are looking
for,
the docstrings are obviously great. But
perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
That leaves me with only one more question: Is there any reason to use
Texinfo markup in those docstrings, given that all more-or-less obvious
ways of accessing it do not seem to use it? Or should I rather give a
well-formatted uncluttered raw text
On 2014/07/17 09:13:54, dak wrote:
mailto:perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
That leaves me with only one more question: Is there any reason to
use
Texinfo markup in those docstrings, given that all more-or-less
obvious
ways of accessing it do not seem to use it? Or should I rather
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm
File scm/font.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm#newcode240
scm/font.scm:240: (define-public (make-expert-font-tree fonts-alist
factor)
There is no doc string here or other documentation.
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm
File scm/font.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm#newcode240
scm/font.scm:240: (define-public (make-expert-font-tree fonts-alist
factor)
On 2014/07/16 09:20:45, dak wrote:
There is no doc
On 16/07/14 14:04, perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm
File scm/font.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/diff/20001/scm/font.scm#newcode240
scm/font.scm:240: (define-public (make-expert-font-tree fonts-alist
Fails make check
--snip--
regression/font-expert-selection.ly
--snip--
Processing
`/tmp/build-lilypond-autobuild/out/lybook-testdb/73/lily-16d682d4.ly'
Parsing...
Renaming input to:
`/tmp/lilypond-autobuild/input/regression/font-expert-selection.ly'
18 matches
Mail list logo
