- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu; Lily devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: Backporting / stable
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, April 30, 2011 1:59 PM
So it appears
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Slightly related to this - if a bug is marked fixed 2.15.0 backport,
should it also have a 2.13 version number for the claim fix?
No.
(well, Carl will add a 2.13 version number -- but that is
something that Carl, and only Carl,
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, April 30, 2011 1:59 PM
So it appears that the biggest source of Critical bugs, and the
thing that
is holding up release of 2.14, is the beam-collision-engraver.
Should we try to remove the beam-collision-engraver from 2.14.0?
Or should
we wait for it to settle
So it appears that the biggest source of Critical bugs, and the thing that
is holding up release of 2.14, is the beam-collision-engraver.
Should we try to remove the beam-collision-engraver from 2.14.0? Or should
we wait for it to settle itself out and make it part of 2.14.0? I can see
- Original Message -
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
To: Lily devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 1:59 PM
Subject: Backporting / stable
So it appears that the biggest source of Critical bugs, and the thing that
is holding up release of 2.14, is the beam
On 4/30/11 8:07 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
To: Lily devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 1:59 PM
Subject: Backporting / stable
So it appears that the biggest source of Critical
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:37:01AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I actually think it would be more work to remove the beam-collision-engraver
than to keep it in. But at this point I expect it to be months before we
are sure we're clear of Critical bugs in beam-collision engraver.
We don't
On 4/30/11 8:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:37:01AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I actually think it would be more work to remove the beam-collision-engraver
than to keep it in. But at this point I expect it to be months before we
are sure
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:52:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 4/30/11 8:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We don't need to be sure that we're clear. All we need... or at
least, all I want before uploading the official 2.14.0... is for
one week without *known*
On Apr 30, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:52:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 4/30/11 8:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We don't need to be sure that we're clear. All we need... or at
least, all I want before uploading the
On 4/30/11 4:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Apr 30, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:52:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 4/30/11 8:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We don't need to be sure that we're
11 matches
Mail list logo
