Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
You're right - it takes a long time :(
Perhaps it'd be wise to make a footnote switch that allows users
to opt-out of this slowness.
Better just to make
New patch here : http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: Bertrand Bordage, mikesol_ufl.edu, joeneeman,
Message:
Thanks Joe!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc
File lily/note-head.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc#newcode189
lily/note-head.cc:189: footnote
On
I meant : we can't use this to do a footnote when in a markup or
markuplines.
Something like :
\markuplines { bla bla bla \footnote { Oh yes ? } bla bla bla }
I know lilypond-book is the best solution for this issue. But it would
be easier if LilyPond had a native support of these features.
I cooked up something that more or less does the job. It's up on Rietveld.
Cheers,
MS
foo.ly
Description: Binary data
foo.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:24 PM, bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant : we can't use this to do a footnote when in a markup or
:p
Great job !
There's no word to thank you enough !
Thanks thanks thanks,
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Why not make the separator a (stencil-valued) property of the
paper-book?
I could, but currently, this patch employs its current stencil kludge
for the
following (perhaps-unfounded) reason. Please let me know
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Why not make the separator a (stencil-valued) property of the
paper-book?
I could, but currently, this patch employs its current stencil kludge
for the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Have you checked the performance of this? This part is linear and so
it makes
Wow, nice job Mike !
I am also currently trying to solve this issue.
With Scheme only I managed to do a good solution for endnotes.
I have some suggestions for your work :
* There should be more space between separator line and footnotes.
* Maybe a smaller separator, like LaTeX does. line-width
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc
File lily/note-head.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc#newcode189
lily/note-head.cc:189: footnote
Any particular reason this belongs to note-head-interface (rather than,
say,
11 matches
Mail list logo
