Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044)

2014-02-09 Thread janek . lilypond
this ROCKS! What about more than 1 tuplet per beam group and nested tuplets? My head explodes every time i see these examples! best, Janek https://codereview.appspot.com/58610044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044)

2014-02-09 Thread david . nalesnik
On 2014/02/09 21:23:29, janek wrote: this ROCKS! :) What about more than 1 tuplet per beam group and nested tuplets? My head explodes every time i see these examples! The more than 1 tuplet per beam group is actually covered by the French beaming example. I could include the nested

Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044)

2014-02-09 Thread Janek WarchoĊ‚
2014-02-09 23:43 GMT+01:00 david.nales...@gmail.com: The more than 1 tuplet per beam group is actually covered by the French beaming example. ok. sorry for not looking carefully enough (too hasty...) I could include the nested tuplet stuff, but would you have any objection to adding it

Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044)

2014-02-08 Thread david . nalesnik
Reviewers: janek, Message: On 2014/02/06 21:44:26, janek wrote: Why are there so few test cases in the regtests? I saw that you have loads of *excellent* examples, and i think that at least half of them is worth being added - don't be shy about it! Here's five more :) Description:

Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044)

2014-02-06 Thread janek . lilypond
Why are there so few test cases in the regtests? I saw that you have loads of *excellent* examples, and i think that at least half of them is worth being added - don't be shy about it! best, Janek https://codereview.appspot.com/58610044/ ___