In short: LGTM. The rest of this comment is just continuing discussion
on some of the points in your previous response.
On 2016/07/12 05:01:16, Dan Eble wrote:
> What are the main user-level justifications for increasing the
> complexity of the Dynamic_performer
It also improves an example
Heikki, thanks for taking the time to review this patch.
What are the main user-level justifications for increasing the
complexity of the
Dynamic_performer in this way (in terms of the amount of code)?
It addresses the original request in the ticket and other cases noted in
response.
It
https://codereview.appspot.com/302910043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
