Hi David and Janek,
On 14/08/13 14:30, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/08/14 12:18:12, janek wrote:
2013/8/14 d...@gnu.org:
would there be a technical problem to have /both/ -! and -' as
shorthands for staccato?
Technical? Not really except that we'd have to make a choice of
convert-ly
On 2013/08/15 09:22:12, Ian Hulin wrote:
Hi David and Janek,
On 14/08/13 14:30, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/08/14 12:18:12, janek wrote:
2013/8/14 d...@gnu.org:
would there be a technical problem to have /both/ -! and -' as
shorthands for staccato?
Technical? Not really except
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:33:55 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/08/15 09:22:12, Ian Hulin wrote:
1+ for -'
(' is visually mnemonic for notation staccatissimo,
also
' is ergonomic on my keyboard -
no Shift key involved, both keys on right-hand side of
main keyboard)
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
'!' also looks like a staccatissimo,
is a stop character so conceptually related to the '.' for staccato,
conflicts less with the use of ''' in pitches:
e'4-! cs-! bf-! g-! e'-! cs-! \tuplet3/2{bf- g- e-}
e'4-' cs-' bf-' g-' e'-' cs-' \tuplet3/2{bf-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Keith
On 15/08/13 18:18, Keith OHara wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:33:55 -0700, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2013/08/15 09:22:12, Ian Hulin wrote:
1+ for -' (' is visually mnemonic for notation staccatissimo,
also ' is ergonomic on my keyboard -
Hi,
i'm late with my comments but i'll publish them anyway.
A general question: what about using -' or -, for staccatissimo? For me
they seem to be somewhat more intuitive.
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/diff/23001/lily/parser.yy
File lily/parser.yy (right):
On 2013/08/14 11:41:43, janek wrote:
A general question: what about using -' or -, for staccatissimo? For
me they
seem to be somewhat more intuitive.
Additional advantage would be that they don't require Shift to produce
on standard keyboard.
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/
On 2013/08/14 11:43:08, janek wrote:
On 2013/08/14 11:41:43, janek wrote:
A general question: what about using -' or -, for staccatissimo?
For me they
seem to be somewhat more intuitive.
Additional advantage would be that they don't require Shift to produce
on
standard keyboard.
2013/8/14 d...@gnu.org:
I don't really agree. staccato is -. so it seems natural for me to have
staccatissimo as -! (I mean, it was -| before). In addition, ' and ,
are slanted in most fonts and that does not really match the visuals of
staccatissimo.
I crosschecked with the parser and it
On 2013/08/14 12:18:12, janek wrote:
2013/8/14 d...@gnu.org:
I crosschecked with the parser and it would not object to either.
The
only argument _for_ such a change would be more visual similarity
rather
than mnemonic value and that rules out -, pretty definitely. One
could
talk
I can't really work with the comments are confusing and I don't really
see that the characterization of the commit messages is accurate. I can
try to reword them in a manner that puts less stress on the state before
the change.
On 2013/08/06 10:30:44, dak wrote:
I can't really work with the comments are confusing
Sorry, I meant the commit message and texidoc.
I don't really see
that the characterization of the commit messages is accurate.
It was the make special characters 'non-special' that confused me.
The
LGTM. Very nice!
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM. Very nice!
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/
Nice. Looking at your remarks
Make tempo range \tempo 20~30 be input as \tempo 20-30 instead
Dash is not particularly nice here
I would expect something like \tempo #20 and \tempo #'(20 30); however
I'm not sure if that would
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
LGTM. Very nice!
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/
Nice. Looking at your remarks
Make tempo range \tempo 20~30 be input as \tempo 20-30 instead
Dash is not particularly nice here
I would expect something like \tempo #20 and \tempo
Looks sensible.
The comments are confusing.
The commit message says almost the opposite of what you do. Maybe
Recognize )(][~| and \! etc. in the lexer.
Treat the ) in c4) like the \p command in c4\p but without the need for
an escape character, and similarly for '\)' ']' '\!' etc. This
16 matches
Mail list logo
