Re: New predefined command

2008-06-22 Thread Trevor Daniels
> 2. If not, how do we indicate the 5 states listed above? > \arpeggioNormal > \arpeggioPointUp > \arpeggioPointDown > \arpeggioBracket > \arpeggioParenthesis "Point" is okay. Another possibility could be "ArrowUp" and "ArrowDown". I like Arrow better. Since the problem was with Up/Down

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:02:10 -0700 "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700 > > "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Actually, there are currently five possi

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-22 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700 > "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Actually, there are currently five possible states: default, up, down, >> bracket, and parenthesis. So we need to find a solution th

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700 "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Trevor Daniels > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM > > > >> What about > >> \arpeggioParenOn > >> \arpeggioParenOff > >> ? > >

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-22 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM > >> What about >> \arpeggioParenOn >> \arpeggioParenOff >> ? > > On/Off work well when there are just two possible states, > but here we have the default, bracket a

RE: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
> -Original Message- > From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:18 AM > To: Patrick McCarty; lilypond-devel > Subject: Re: New predefined command > > Definitely! > > > I think an \arpeggioParen command might be suitab

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Gilles THIBAULT
BTW: May I take this as an opportunity to offer to also rename sustainDown\Up into SustainOn\Off? Note that in the Midi norm, the expression : "Pedal on/off (Sustain)" is used. http://www.midi.org/about-midi/table3.shtml (control 64) Gilles ___

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Gilles THIBAULT
BTW: May I take this as an opportunity to offer to also rename sustainDown\Up into SustainOn\Off? Note that in the Midi norm, the expression : "Pedal on/off (Sustain)" is used. http://www.midi.org/about-midi/table3.shtml (control 64) Gilles ___

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/6/17 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I guess that Up/Down makes more sense to a pianist than On/Off > (even though it has nothing to do with the Up/Down as used for other > macros). As a French pianist, I feel much more familiar with On/Off than Up/Down. Besides Up/Down implies two eq

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Trevor Daniels
Valentin Villenave wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:14 AM BTW: May I take this as an opportunity to offer to also rename sustainDown\Up into SustainOn\Off? See my former mail on: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-04/msg00037.html I'm in favour of this. Anyone who has grasp

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:18:04 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24 AM > I think an \arpeggioParen command might be suitable. Looks good; it matches the existing \arpeggioBrac

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Valentin Villenave wrote: BTW: May I take this as an opportunity to offer to also rename sustainDown\Up into SustainOn\Off? I guess that Up/Down makes more sense to a pianist than On/Off (even though it has nothing to do with the Up/Down as used for other macros). /Mats

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/6/17 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I like Mats' point about "WTF does \...Default do?". IMO, it's ok > to use this for direction, since so many things are \...Up, > \...down, and \...Neutral. However, we should probably avoid > generic "turn off" terms like that for everything else

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:18:04 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24 AM > > I think an \arpeggioParen command might be suitable. > > Looks good; it matches the existing \arpeggioBracket. > > Should we modify the existing \arpeggioB

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Trevor Daniels wrote: Should we also define a command to return to the default behaviour? \arpeggioDefault maybe? (\arpeggioNeutral reverts the stencil, but also reverts the direction, so isn't quite right). Who will remember the distinction between \arpeggioNeutral and \arpeggioDefault wi

Re: New predefined command

2008-06-16 Thread Trevor Daniels
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24 AM I have just documented the new "parenthesis" style arpeggio bracket that Han-Wen created a while back. Here is a link to the News item: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS Since it involves two \override commands, it mi

New predefined command

2008-06-16 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi list, I have just documented the new "parenthesis" style arpeggio bracket that Han-Wen created a while back. Here is a link to the News item: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS Since it involves two \override commands, it might be nice to have a predefined command for t