Dewdman42 st...@bstage.com writes:
Quite unfortunate though, lilypond is an extremely cool technology
that MANY MANY people are missing out on because of things like this
and particularly because of the attitude of the core developers, who
are the only ones that really know how the hell it
Hello Mr. Kastrup.
People like you seem to confuse the concept of polite with
servant.
Ah yes, people like me. People who confuse concepts. People who are
not as brilliant as yourself.
You are illustrating my point exactly, Mr. Kastrup.
You presume to know who I am, what I do, and what
Hi Johannes.
On May 12, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Aaron,
by sending a private exchange you proved something. You still have
not
earned respect with this person.
Look, I understand a dev list is for developers. These posts of mine
have been commentary. If what I
BTW, I completely agree this thread was not handled well, not only by
me, but by everyone from its inception to the present entry which I
hope is its termination. Quite an ugly business! Very bad form shown
by all! I do offer my apologies for my part, and yes - by all means
I hope
Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-PDF-Problem
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:50:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can create
PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
(sigh)
I agree. Why haven't you bothered to submit patches to fix this?
- Graham
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Dewdman42 st...@bstage.com wrote:
2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can create
PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
(sigh)
Yes, it is sad. You would almost think that noone gets paid to fix
user complaints.
Oh, wait.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-PDF-Problem-tp11701854p23486715.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive
://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-PDF-Problem-tp11701854p23487068.html
Sent from the Gnu
Dewdman, the bigger problem is your initial email, which is itself
hostile and insulting:
Dewdman42 wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Dewdman42 st...@bstage.com wrote:
2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can
create
PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dewdman42 st...@bstage.com wrote:
didn't. The only response is fix it yourself?
That's not a realistic response, THAT is a BS response from someone who does
not give a damn about the lilypond user community.
It's the response to someone who does not give a
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years later I am
a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2 years nothing had
been done, was not really too out of line if you think about it.
That's garbage.
Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years later I am
a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2 years nothing had
been done, was not really too out of line if you think about
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called In Defense of
Being a Complete A-Hole
No, programmers / hackers are smart folks
In message 23486715.p...@talk.nabble.com, Dewdman42 st...@bstage.com
writes
If I knew how I would. isn't it obvious that a few people hold the power to
control the development of lilypond while the rest of us are mere mortals?
It's Free Software. He who puts in the effort makes the rules. I
Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called In Defense of Being a
Complete A-Hole
No, programmers /
Hi,
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called In Defense of Being a
Complete
But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years
later I am a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2
years nothing had been done, was not really too out of line if you
think about it.
One of the key players, Rune, has passed away.
We can answer your request
Han-Wen Nienhuys skrev:
Sounds like bullock's manure to me.
You are right - the problem is not really related to this.
I still think that we should change to 1/72 inch instead if 1/72.27 inch
because this way all staff lines will have same distance on paper and on
screen, whereas with
2007/7/20, Rune Zedeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are right - the problem is not really related to this.
I still think that we should change to 1/72 inch instead if 1/72.27 inch
because this way all staff lines will have same distance on paper and on
screen, whereas with 1/72.27 it may seldomly
Okay, I took a look.
I understand why the viewers have problems with lilypond's pdfs: For
some reason lilypond does loads of conversions to and from millimeters.
I think it has something to do with lily defining one point to be
1/72.27 inch, whereas a postscript (and pdf) point is 1/72 inch.
Rune Zedeler skrev:
I understand why the viewers have problems with lilypond's pdfs: For
some reason lilypond does loads of conversions to and from millimeters.
Oh, I never learn not to post comments late at night.
The above really had nothing (afaics) to do with the problem.
It should be
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-PDF-Problem-tf4114991.html#a11702498
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive
).
However, in the PDF manual, the same example shows up perfectly.
Hence, I guess this behaviour is probably an eps versus pdf problem
rather than a problem of the ligature implementation, right?
Greetings,
Juergen
P.S.: I can eliminate the symptom in the manual by slightly modifying
the example
On 7-Jun-06, at 12:53 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
it could be that the BBox of the EPS file is broken (eg. if dimension
calculations are off); that could result in an empty EPS bbox, which
is correctly translated to PNG.
FWIW, today I noticed that the BB of the first example in 8.2.3
manual, the same example shows up perfectly.
Hence, I guess this behaviour is probably an eps versus pdf problem rather
than a problem of the ligature implementation, right?
Greetings,
Juergen
P.S.: I can eliminate the symptom in the manual by slightly modifying the
example, but I guess finding
26 matches
Mail list logo
