Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:26:25PM +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote: Hi Patrick, So I spent a few hours today hacking on the SVG output, and here are some samples of the current output I have: [...] Great work!! Thanks! Just a random comment that occurred to me while skimming

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:45:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote: So I spent a few hours today hacking on the SVG output... What do you think? Wow. Nice work. I don't quite understand why the textual elements look rasterized, but I guess that's what you're still

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Maximilian Albert
2009/7/14 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com: Unfortunately, this would be very difficult.  Elements are dumped into the SVG file in the order they occur in the page stencil, and (almost) every one is independently positioned as well. Ah, okay. That's what I though. Out of interest: At the

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:13:12PM +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote: 2009/7/14 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com: Unfortunately, this would be very difficult.  Elements are dumped into the SVG file in the order they occur in the page stencil, and (almost) every one is independently

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Maximilian Albert
Hi Patrick, Ah, okay. That's what I though. Out of interest: At the time when these elements get written into the SVG file, do they know about their mutual relationships? E.g., does a beam know which note heads it belongs to (or vice versa)? No.  The closest thing the elements possess that

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: P.S.: What's all this about text element being rasterized or converted to paths? I can edit them as regular text elements in Inkscape without problems. Now that I think about it, I'm not really sure what Mark was referring to. Possibly the low graphics quality at

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:55:39AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote: P.S.: What's all this about text element being rasterized or converted to paths? I can edit them as regular text elements in Inkscape without problems. Now that I think about it, I'm not really sure

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Maximilian Albertmaximilian.alb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Patrick, Ah, okay. That's what I though. Out of interest: At the time when these elements get written into the SVG file, do they know about their mutual relationships? E.g., does a beam know which

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-13 Thread Maximilian Albert
Hi Patrick, So I spent a few hours today hacking on the SVG output, and here are some samples of the current output I have: [...] Great work!! Just a random comment that occurred to me while skimming through your samples: When moving individual elements (like note heads, staff lines, beams,

Re: SVG status update

2009-07-13 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: So I spent a few hours today hacking on the SVG output... What do you think? Wow. Nice work. I don't quite understand why the textual elements look rasterized, but I guess that's what you're still working on. Not having studied too much SVG, I use the poor man's SVG