On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
There are two critical issues that we're going to have to start
seriously thinking about now if 2.18 is going to happen anytime soon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2733
I'm not comfortable marking this critical: not
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for a long time, in which it may be
worth pushing the translate_axis
On 27 mars 2013, at 07:54, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for
Thanks for all answers.
On 8 January 2012 23:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 8 stycznia 2012 10:11 użytkownik James pkx1...@gmail.com napisał:
Start by looking here:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
According to our motto the aim of LilyPond is music engraving to
everyone - i'd say it's a very good goal. It would mean that a
person with average computer skills (like navigating a web browser and
using word processor) should be able to create
Hello,
2012/1/8 Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com:
What's the aim of Lilypond?
err..
LilyPond is a music engraving program, devoted to producing the
highest-quality sheet music possible. It brings the aesthetics of
traditionally engraved music to computer printouts.
And why isn't it
On Jan 8, 2012, at 2:54 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
Are there some guidelines how to write new code to work in the same
manner as the already written code?
We have a contributor's guide. It is not complete, but that's
W dniu 8 stycznia 2012 02:54 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
* Let's assume that I would like to help in developing Lilypond, but
I don't have my own idea, what part of it I could
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
that a sort of coordination is needed in each project.
We have the amount of coordination that we have chosen.
* Let's assume that I would like
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\layout {
\layout-from { \compressFullBarRests
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'common-shortest-duration =
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
What i want to say is, i'm afraid you might have forgotten how it
feels to be a non-programmer. It's not a joke that for average person
that wants to produce some notation, it's hard enough to use text
input.
In the light of the focus of the
David,
2012/1/7 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I really don't quite get the point of complaining that I provide
alternative ways of accessing functionality. Nobody forces you to make
use of them.
2012/1/7 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
In the light of the focus of the work I have been doing for
First of all I would like to apologize for misjudging Lilypond project.
As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
that a sort of coordination is needed in each project. Maybe for some of
them there must be one boss with many programmers and designers, while for
other
2012/1/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\layout {
\layout-from { \compressFullBarRests
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'common-shortest-duration =
#(ly:make-moment 6 10)
}
etc...
}
ok...
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I'm sure that other people have their pet projects as well. The
ensemble of these
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:14 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I'm sure that other people
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:14 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\with \settingsFrom { \compressFullBarRests }
}
\context {
\Staff
\with \settingsFrom { \accidentalStyle modern }
}
}
}
\end{lilypond}
\ph is a music function written in
On 3 January 2012 21:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a TeX specialist, system programmer, Emacs specialist, the GNU
maintainer (and a rather pitiful one) for AUCTeX (lytex and itexi
anybody? preview-latex for Lilypond?)
Mmm... Preview for Lilypond? Sounds like a
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
On 3 January 2012 21:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a TeX specialist, system programmer, Emacs specialist, the GNU
maintainer (and a rather pitiful one) for AUCTeX (lytex and itexi
anybody? preview-latex for
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\with \settingsFrom { \compressFullBarRests }
}
\context {
\Staff
\with \settingsFrom { \accidentalStyle modern }
}
}
}
\end{lilypond}
2012/1/4 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
hello,
On 3 Jan 2012, at 22:26, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I might have given you a wrong impression, i don't think its really
that bad. There is some teamwork, but no leader indeed.
to use an English expression ... poppycock!
Janek
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\settingsFrom is actually returning a Scheme expression for \with to
use. It makes things rather simpler than more complex, even though it
constitutes a Scheme expression.
Um... i would really love to be able to type
\layout {
Adding Luke to recipients again... (please remember to include him as
he's not signed to our mailing lists),
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
Regarding all those fragments of Janek's and David's emails: For some time
I have been observing how
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\settingsFrom is actually returning a Scheme expression for \with to
use. It makes things rather simpler than more complex, even though it
constitutes a Scheme expression.
Um... i would really love to be
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but my impression is that
there is no particular direction in which we are going.
I think that it is very difficult to set these goals because different things
interest different people. I know that Bertrand and I
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
There is a _reason_ the remaining OSX and Windows based developers
are doing (definitely important) documentation and web site work.
They are to a large degree locked out and dependent on
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
There is a _reason_
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
No. I have an Ubuntu VM which I use for quick experiments and a very
fast Ubuntu PC which I use for full builds. But I support lilypond
because I _use_ it for typesetting music on a _Windows_
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we develop within a GNU environment, bugs
specific to
On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David.
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class too little,
too late.
I second David. Given that we develop within a
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 12:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
One in-the-middle approach is to check out package managers that are
offering LilyPond releases. I know, for example, that brew offers a
version of LilyPond on Mac OS X. If we provide a list of package
managers and how-tos for the
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will benefit users of
many operating systems is likely to fall in the class
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 12:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
If we refuse thinking about stable releases by taking GUB as an
excuse, the grand next stable release that will
2012/1/3 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
It so happens that none of these Critical issues are really
fixable by reverting a single commit.
[...]
ok, thanks for this explanation!
Is finding them an easy (no knowledge
needed, a complete set of dumbed-down instructions can be given)
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
The Learning Guide and the Notation Guide need a complete rereading and
reorganization, and it is not like the Extending Guide is in
significantly better shape.
I'd like to fix them too, but i don't have
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
The Learning Guide and the Notation Guide need a complete rereading and
reorganization, and it is not like the Extending Guide is in
significantly better shape.
I'd like
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:57:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
My question to David, because I am not getting where the 'ire' is
coming from, why do you care if we release dev after dev release vs
stable?
Yeah, especially since Carl was *already* making
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 20:49, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:57:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
My question to David, because I am not getting where the 'ire' is
coming from, why do you care if we release dev
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:57:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
My question to David, because I am not getting where the 'ire' is
coming from, why do you care if we release dev after dev release vs
stable?
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
LilyPond needs to get into a state where, say, half the
engravers are written and maintained in Scheme. And by Scheme I don't
mean Scheme at the level Nicolas can barely handle but Scheme a
Fortran
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
LilyPond needs to get into a state where, say, half the
engravers are written and maintained in Scheme. And by Scheme I don't
mean Scheme at the level Nicolas can barely
Hi Luke,
nice to see you joining the discussion :)
W dniu 3 stycznia 2012 23:06 użytkownik Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com napisał:
That's like + from me!
In general, i agree that we should think in a more 'release-oriented'
way (last stable release was half a year ago, so we
hello,
On 3 Jan 2012, at 22:26, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke,
nice to see you joining the discussion :)
W dniu 3 stycznia 2012 23:06 użytkownik Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com napisał:
That's like + from me!
In general, i agree that we should think
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:59:47PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I see the following critical issues:
-snip-
There is, actually, a wagonload of other changes underfoot that does not
appear quite compatible with releasing a version called stable to me.
It seems strange to me that the _above_
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:59:47PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I see the following critical issues:
-snip-
There is, actually, a wagonload of other changes underfoot that does not
appear quite compatible with releasing a version called
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
This was the result of between 25 to 40 emails in August 2011 on
lilypond-devel. A quick scan didn't reveal your name amongst
those emails, but we simply cannot afford to
2012/1/2 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
This was the result of between 25 to 40 emails in August 2011 on
lilypond-devel. A quick scan didn't reveal your name amongst
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
This was the result of between 25 to 40 emails in August 2011 on
lilypond-devel. A quick scan didn't reveal your name amongst
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
We could certainly consider dropping support for OSX or windows.
That sort of token solidarity is actually counterproductive:
if you believe that non-releases lead to non-users,
2012/1/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I am afraid that we are painting ourselves into a corner. And I don't
think that we are doing ourselves a favor by defining stable as a
random moment when somebody managed to get GUB to run for Windows and
OSX. We should define stable based on the
(sorry for double-post)
2012/1/2 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:23:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
If you are aware of any other issues which fall under the
definition (i.e. a reproducible failure to
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:24:19AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
By the way, do we have a policy about regressions?
Yes, they're bad? :)
I remember that
reverting bad commits was discussed in the past, and i'm quite for
this solution.
I don't see information about which commits caused our
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:03:08AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
We could certainly consider dropping support for OSX or windows.
That sort of token solidarity is actually counterproductive:
On 11-01-01 03:24 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
or an
art history / research grant. I think the latter is more
likely... for example, if somebody got a grant to typeset 17th
century Norweigan folk songs, and decided to use lilypond, and
spent x% of the grant towards improving community-oriented
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:29:11AM -0500, Boris Shingarov wrote:
The Lilypond project has a very specific set of objectives. There
is a defined set of procedures, a roadmap, a set of criteria of
what is acceptable to go into the codebase, etc.
This is true of any (well-organized) project.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 01:14:19PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
version, but this looks fine. My intention was that, even if it
was a minor bug, then someone had put work in recently to fix it.
If someone else has just unpicked that, then this a Bad Thing and
should be corrected.
I don't want
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: critical issues
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:37:35PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Priority-Critical
[snip long-ish discussion]
OK, I think we reached a conclusion on this and so would like to make a
patch. I propose:
Priority-Critical: LilyPond segfaults, a regression (see below) against a
previous stable version or a regression against a fix developed for this
version. This does not
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:37:35PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Priority-Critical: LilyPond segfaults, a regression (see below)
against a previous stable version or a regression against a fix
developed for this version. This does not apply where the
regression occurred because a feature was
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:15:22AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:37:35PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Priority-Critical: LilyPond segfaults, a regression (see below)
against a previous stable version or a regression against a fix
developed for this version. This
Look, we simply *cannot* offer users anything that would be
reasonable by most standards. We have highly embarrassing bugs
from 2006 that we're not even *pretending* to be working on. We've
been in release crunch mode for at least six months. The only
glimmer of hope on the horizon is
What we would need is a payed full-time developer.
I have forgotten to say that such a developer needs certain skills in
addition to C++ and Scheme, namely being a musician...
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic opportunity
would be to get some grant money from some artistic organization.
Mhmm. `Programming' in its broadest sense is research, thus getting
grants limits the number of persons enormously. However, the number
of music researchers
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 01, 2011 7:16 AM
Nope, for precisely the reason you gave earlier: our documentation
generally has zero input from programmers, so it's not at all a
good representation of what's intended.
We have a set of intended to be working examples. They're
2011/1/1 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org:
What we would need is a payed full-time developer. However, this is
expensive. Assuming that the programmer has a family with children,
an appartment, etc., and to provide a reasonably good living for him
or her, this would be about 3000 Euros a month
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:39:37AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic opportunity
would be to get some grant money from some artistic organization.
Mhmm. `Programming' in its broadest sense is research, thus getting
grants limits the
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:31:23 -0800, Trevor Daniels
t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
... the concern I had was this. Quite a lot of the
documentation was written, not by inspecting the code
to see what was intended, but by experimenting and
writing up
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In my idle moments, I like to discourage myself by trying to
figure out how long it would take to achieve something
reasonable for users. Let's play this game now, and start
making some unrealistic-but-just-possible assumptions:
1. reasonable
Graham:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:10:49AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
...
But maybe there is a group of LilyPond philanthropists who can afford
this and are willing to do so...
I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic
opportunity would be to get some grant money from some
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:06:04PM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
Graham:
Of course, writing artistic and research grants is a non-trivial
amount of work, and it's hardly guaranteed to have any results.
But I think that with the right angle -- be that collaborative
folk music archival, or
Graham Percival wrote Friday, December 31, 2010 11:20 PM
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:43:36PM +, Keith OHara wrote:
Trevor Daniels t.daniels at treda.co.uk writes:
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:56 AM
I want to keep the word intentionally, though -- if
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:31:23 -0800, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
... the concern I had was this. Quite a lot of the
documentation was written, not by inspecting the code
to see what was intended, but by experimenting and
writing up what was found. I certainly worked that
way,
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:31:23AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, December 31, 2010 11:20 PM
However, lilypond never intentionally tried to
avoid those objects colliding -- in fact, intentionally avoiding
this collision would require a fair chunk of extra code.
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:56 AM
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:32:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
On 12/28/10 4:18 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The difference between Phil's version and the previous version
Trevor Daniels t.daniels at treda.co.uk writes:
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:56 AM
I want to keep the word intentionally, though -- if something
only happened to work because of a happy coincidence of bugs, then
breaking that should not be a Critical bug.
I'm not
Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2010, um 04:57:47 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 12/28/10 4:18 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
In the case of #3, if it's not actually a problem, then when a
programmer takes a look at the issue, they can quickly mark it as
an invalid report. I
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:32:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
On 12/28/10 4:18 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The difference between Phil's version and the previous version is
Something that worked as it should in a previous
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:24:32PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
Ironically, although the current printed policy seems to be too
inclusive for Critical issues, my main concern is that bug squad
members are classifying stuff as High instead of
On 12/28/10 4:18 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:24:32PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
I think one of these was mine. This is the thing I want to discuss
before creating a patch. I think the
-
This is a multipart MIME message.
Karl Hammar:
Carl Sorensen:
...
I've posted a patch on Rietveld. Can you do the
regression test?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1195044
After a make test-redo I get:
. the mandatory output-distance.
. a diff of tree.gittext, showing Carls patch
.
And here comes the test-baseline file.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
attachment: tie-semi-single.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Carl Sorensen:
...
I've posted a patch on Rietveld. Can you do the
regression test?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1195044
After a make test-redo I get:
. the mandatory output-distance.
. a diff of tree.gittext, showing Carls patch
. 314 below threshold
. 2062 unchanged
From this I assume
On 5/15/10 1:12 AM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen:
...
I've posted a patch on Rietveld. Can you do the
regression test?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1195044
After a make test-redo I get:
. the mandatory output-distance.
. a diff of tree.gittext, showing Carls
Joe Neeman schrieb:
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 22:14 +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
Issue 1080: Regression: bar lines in double bar are positioned too
close together
pnorcks mentions commit 27a4d9354effb09c696925881ec4df007da8a0db
as a possible cause. Reverting part of that commit:
gives me the
Carl Sorensen:
On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
make test-baseline
...
make check
...
Ok, done that.
With the guidance from http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881:
I can't explain why, but making the print function pure by redefining
On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen:
On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
make test-baseline
...
make check
...
Ok, done that.
With the guidance from http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881:
I can't
Carl Sorensen:
On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen:
...
You also need to redefine the 'stencil for laissez-vibrez tie in
scm/define-grobs.scm.
...
I can help with doning the regression test. Second-guessing what
Niels patch was about was not included in
On 5/14/10 8:18 AM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen:
On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen:
...
You also need to redefine the 'stencil for laissez-vibrez tie in
scm/define-grobs.scm.
...
I can help with doning the regression test.
Issue 881: Arpeggios may collide with laissezVibrer ties
According to the bug tracker, v2.11.19's output is what to aim for.
Neil gave the fix:
(define-public (laissez-vibrer::print grob)
(ly:tie::print grob))
(then add laissez-vibrer::print to pure-print-callbacks)
But he has not done a
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
How do one do a regtest?
Regression check; by compiling stuff.
8.1 Introduction to regression tests
The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make'
targets. The output of the regression tests is also
Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
documentation
Issue 1038: more technical website items
Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released
software. I can understand that it can be critical for the official
site, but how can that be
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:14:17PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
***
Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
documentation
Why is this a critical issue for the lilypond release?
Because the patch has been hanging around for over a year. My
decision on this
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
documentation
Issue 1038: more technical website items
Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released
software. I can understand
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
