Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> but the kerning of "Av" [...] doesn't seem right to me. Is that >>> as it should be? Yes, it is correct – and ugly, I agree. The Computer Modern font family doesn't contain kerning values between 'A' and 'v'. Werner

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi Jonas, If I'm not wrong, my question is how to force a re-build of out-www/en/identifiers.tely. I think you need to delete out{,-www}/en/internals.texi. This will retrigger the rule to dump the internal documentation, which is partly included into the Notation Reference. That did it.

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 18:04 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser: > Hi James, > > > > > See: > > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#building-a-single-document > > > > Did you do the 'touch' command? > > > Now I did :-) (thanks!), but touch'ing

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread James
Hello, On 19/09/2021 17:04, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Hi James, See: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#building-a-single-document Did you do the 'touch' command? Now I did :-) (thanks!), but touch'ing notation.tely doesn't do the trick. It says

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi James, See: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#building-a-single-document Did you do the 'touch' command? Now I did :-) (thanks!), but touch'ing notation.tely doesn't do the trick. If I'm not wrong, my question is how to force a re-build of

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
but the kerning of "Av" in doesn't seem right to me. Is that as it should be? (The image is from the pdf in the official 2.22/2.23 build.) ... no image... Sorry, shouldn't use inline images. See attached. Lukas

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread James
Hello, On 19/09/2021 16:24, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Hi, I'm probably missing something very obvious: After changing a docstring in ly/music-functions-init.ly, what steps are necessary to re-build notation.pdf in order to check the result in "A.19 Available music functions"? If I only

Re: Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> PS. Speaking of that appendix: I don't know much about typography, > but the kerning of "Av" in > > doesn't seem right to me. Is that as it should be? (The image is > from the pdf in the official 2.22/2.23 build.) ... no image... Werner

Re-building Appendix A of notation.pdf

2021-09-19 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi, I'm probably missing something very obvious: After changing a docstring in ly/music-functions-init.ly, what steps are necessary to re-build notation.pdf in order to check the result in "A.19 Available music functions"? If I only delete notation.pdf and re-build it using make -C