On 15 November 2010 07:07, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
The reason I am asking, is because even after spending 10 minutes looking at
the procedural-style code in the current live-elements-list, I am still not
sure what the answer is to the question, what does this function do?
On 16 November 2010 00:37, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a brief look, and it looks like 4b7d9566 by Neil is to blame.
I'm not sure what I'm guilty of here; in the absence of an exported
function which turns grob-arrays into lists (which I did contemplate
adding at the time),
On 10-11-16 05:37 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
I'm not sure what I'm guilty of here; in the absence of an exported
function which turns grob-arrays into lists (which I did contemplate
adding at the time), the code I added seems unobjectionable.
That's it: you are basically saying it's perfect
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
where grob-array-list is a function which I just made.
The reason I am asking, is because even after spending 10 minutes looking at
the procedural-style code in the current live-elements-list, I am still not
sure what
In scm/output-lib.scm, the (internally used) function
live-elements-list is defined like this:
(define (live-elements-list me)
(let* ((elements (ly:grob-object me 'elements))
(elts-length (ly:grob-array-length elements))
(live-elements '()))
(let get-live ((len
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
In scm/output-lib.scm, the (internally used) function live-elements-listis
defined like this:
(define (live-elements-list me)
(let* ((elements (ly:grob-object me 'elements))
(elts-length
On 10-11-14 11:59 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
Any specific reason why not just filter on the is-live? predicate?
Doesn't filter just work on plain scheme lists? elements is a
grob-array object. Of course, if filter doesn't work on such objects
it might be better to write a version of filter
