Re: Stop smobifying Transform (issue 567580043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

On 2020/05/09 16:19:59, hanwenn wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:56 PM wrote: > > > > On 2020/05/09 12:00:01, hanwenn wrote: > > > On 2020/05/09 11:03:12, dak wrote: > > > > Rationale? This negates work done as part of issue 5347 with the > > long-term > > > goal > > > > of

Re: Stop smobifying Transform (issue 567580043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:56 PM wrote: > > On 2020/05/09 12:00:01, hanwenn wrote: > > On 2020/05/09 11:03:12, dak wrote: > > > Rationale? This negates work done as part of issue 5347 with the > long-term > > goal > > > of making transforms a better integrated and accessible part of > stencils. >

Re: Stop smobifying Transform (issue 567580043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

On 2020/05/09 12:00:01, hanwenn wrote: > On 2020/05/09 11:03:12, dak wrote: > > Rationale? This negates work done as part of issue 5347 with the long-term > goal > > of making transforms a better integrated and accessible part of stencils. > This > > will be increasingly important when we move

Re: Stop smobifying Transform (issue 567580043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: dak, Message: On 2020/05/09 11:03:12, dak wrote: > Rationale? This negates work done as part of issue 5347 with the long-term goal > of making transforms a better integrated and accessible part of stencils. This > will be increasingly important when we move to Cairo since Cairo

Stop smobifying Transform (issue 567580043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

Rationale? This negates work done as part of issue 5347 with the long-term goal of making transforms a better integrated and accessible part of stencils. This will be increasingly important when we move to Cairo since Cairo cannot represent rotations by multiples of 90 degrees cleanly other than