Both done - closing issues on Rietveld and adding 2310 to Rietveld's title.
On 3 April 2012 04:00, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Tools which we have written for the purpose are aware of the two
unconnected sources of information about patches and have been modified to
allow you to refer
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't git cl be rewritten to change the title of Rietveld issue to
include Google Code's issue numer?
sure, go ahead.
I don't have time because of gsoc.
cheers,
Janek
Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca írta (2012. április 2. 3:53):
The items below are the result of a search on Rietveld for open items
associated with the lilypond trunk. In some cases, the tracker item has
been closed, so the Rietveld item should also be closed. In others, work
continues but it
Well, I must say that I don't understand what I'm expected to do. Could you
please explain me once more and say also what Apparently replaced by R
5975074, pls add issue nbr to summary means? Especially add issue
*nbr*to summary.
Łukasz
On 2 April 2012 03:53, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
On 12-04-02 04:18 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
Well, I must say that I don't understand what I'm expected to
do. Could you please explain me once more and say also what
Apparently replaced by R 5975074, pls add issue nbr to summary
means? Especially add issue *nbr* to summary.
Łukasz
On 2
The items below are the result of a search on Rietveld for open items
associated with the lilypond trunk. In some cases, the tracker item has
been closed, so the Rietveld item should also be closed. In others,
work continues but it would be good to cross-reference the tracker item
in the
