mechanisms considerably (especially because it's connected
with some vertical and horizontal lyrics spacing issues that should be
addressed).
I have some thoughts on these topics, but from what i see the
discussion about them may become monstrous in size, so i'm waiting
until 2.14 is out.
I suppose
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/1/19 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
In my opinion this issue is important and
Graham,
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/1/19 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) -
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:49:01PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Please submit a bug report and let's get it in the tracker.
Doubly so if it's a regression.
Exactly this
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:58:46PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Graham,
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
If necessary, we can pretend that it's deliberate (after noting it
in the Changes document), call it a non-regression, make it
non-critical, and have a release.
Hi,
the new vertical spacing is evaluating the skyline of the lyrics lines for
spacing. This leads to situations with a very uneven look, as the example
below shows. IMHO the tallest glyph in the used font should be used to
derive the height of the lyrics line.
Regards,
Christian
\version
Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi,
the new vertical spacing is evaluating the skyline of the lyrics lines for
spacing. This leads to situations with a very uneven look, as the example
below shows. IMHO the tallest glyph in the used font should be used to
derive the height of the lyrics line.
This
