Am 14.12.2013 12:20, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- lilypond.org/web/ : the old website
What is this old stuff good for?
Confusing search engines into misleading people there seems to be its
main purpose nowadays. It's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could
questions: Manual-Web
Am 14.12.2013 12:20, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- lilypond.org/web/ : the old website
What is this old stuff good for?
Confusing search engines into misleading people there seems to be its
main purpose nowadays. It's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it has something of a split personality
Am 14.12.2013 04:57, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:34:28PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
We don't provide
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it
Am 14.12.2013 11:04, schrieb David Kastrup:
t's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could disrupt the regular operations when
removed.
Would be removing it (locally), making a full make website (and make
doc?) and walking through the whole site manually be
questions: Manual-Web
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using
in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Website-questions-Manual-Web-tp155674p155727.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
business since the 301 redirects would
prevent the search engines from seeing any duplicate content (at least for
those website manual pages that were redirected).
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Website-questions-Manual-Web-tp155674p155729.html
Sent
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:34 PM
Subject: Website questions: Manual-Web
I've raised this issue already, but I think it needs to be considered in
its own thread
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:34:28PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
We don't provide links to the info documents, because IMO none
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it has something of a split personality between being
part of the documentation and the
I've raised this issue already, but I think it needs to be considered in
its own thread:
What to do with Manuals-Web?
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
13 matches
Mail list logo