Carl Sorensen writes:
I think the best thing is to get 2.14.0 out now, include a warning
that it doesn't work on windows 7 SP1 but that we're testing a fix
and hope to have a new version out soon. Then we switch to
ghostscript-9.0 in 2.15.0 and start testing.
Sure, however/or esp. as:
On 5/30/11 3:46 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Actually, the last patch than Jan posted should make LilyPond work on
windows 7 sp1, IIUC. So as long as we backport that patch, we're good with
windows.
Indeed! Ghostscript 9.0 is not required, neither is freetype 2.4.4 --
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:09:53PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
In trying to nail down the notorious #1562, I started a ghostscript-9.0
branch in GUB, which uses ghostscript 9.02, freetype-2.4.4 and includes
a small ghostscript installer fixlet.
It would be nice if you could find a time
On 5/29/11 3:48 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:09:53PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
In trying to nail down the notorious #1562, I started a ghostscript-9.0
branch in GUB, which uses ghostscript 9.02, freetype-2.4.4 and includes
a small
