A few days ago, this enhancement request
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=824
has been mentioned.
I don't think that the following snippet (see joined file) can be integrated
as a patch for Lilypond, so it is rather a workaround, but it seems to work.
To use it, you need a file
2009/8/4 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
I can imagine how this would be implemented, but it would be a lot of
work. If anyone is up for a challenge, I can give some pointers. :)
OK, now there's no way I'm gonna let you get away with such a promise :-)
Jay Anderson wrote:
global =
{
\time 4/4 s4*4*10
\time 3/4 s4*3*5
\time 7/4 s4*7
\time 4/4 \anchor #'coda s4*4*10
\bar |.
}
\addAt #'coda \global {\tempo \markup Extremely slow}
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Werner
___
lilypond-devel
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Why not?
- Mark
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Why not?
I believe it confuses users that Scheme code allows more symbols
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Would it be technically feasible/possible to establish a system of
anchors instead?
This would be indeed a great feature!
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
Seriously, I seem to recall that I proposed this feature some 11-12
years ago and at that
Hi Mats,
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
An *extremely* underrated and powerful command. ;-p
One alternative way to achieve the same thing is to simply do a
global =
{
\time 4/4 s4*4*10
\time 3/4 s4*3*5
\time 7/4 s4*7
{ \time 4/4
\bar |. }
\anchoredStuff
}
Nope: that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Mats Bengtssonmats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
Seriously, I seem to recall that I proposed this feature some 11-12 years
ago and at that Han-Wen at that time answered with a No!!! (I don't
remember any details and
Would it be technically feasible/possible to establish a system of
anchors instead?
This would be indeed a great feature!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello all,
Like many Lilyponders, I break down my code into variables, e.g.
global (for time signature changes, etc.), notes, dynamics, etc. The
main irritation with this (IMO) is that each variable requires a
complete set of skips in order to keep the timing accurate.
Would it be
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Like many Lilyponders, I break down my code into variables, e.g.
global (for time signature changes, etc.), notes, dynamics, etc.
The main irritation with this (IMO) is that each variable
requires a complete set of skips in order to keep the timing
accurate.
Would
Hi Mark,
Have you tried using the \tag command?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Different-
editions-from-one-source#Using-tags
Certainly I've used \tag for filtering content, but I don't
understand how \tag could help with the problem I'm describing...
could you
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Kieren
MacMillankieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
Like many Lilyponders, I break down my code into variables, e.g. global (for
time signature changes, etc.), notes, dynamics, etc. The main irritation
with this (IMO) is that each variable requires
2009/7/22 Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com:
In any case I think anchors could be very useful for a variety of purposes.
Yaay! For one, it would simply change my life :-)
I'm not sure if it is at all possible without major changes to the way
Lily currently works though. I'll wait a few days to
Hello all,
Jay's \addTo twist gave me a (naive) thought...
If \addTo simply constructed (e.g., appended to) an ordered list of
moment-event (moment-grob?) pairs, couldn't the parser simply grab
the one(s) it needed at any given moment?
Yaay! For one, it would simply change my life :-)
16 matches
Mail list logo