On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:40 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.orgwrote:
I did my first tests with this on a Mozart horn concerto that takes 42
seconds to compile. It looks like using .aux files would shave off 2-4
seconds for the line breaking (assuming that line breaking is the time
On 2012-09-19 05:40, Ramana Kumar wrote:
2) Create an ugly-lily.ly [1] file. This file would remove
several engravers, change most callbacks to hardcoded values and
have everything spaced on one line unless breaks were forced and
would output the document to a huge page. This could be used
On 7 août 2012, at 04:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files to speed up
recompilation. He also said working out the details might take months
of discussion. I'd like to start that discussion in a relaxed
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:36:05AM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files to speed up
recompilation. He also said working out the details might take
On 6 août 2012, at 23:23, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:36:05AM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:02:59AM +0200, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 6 août 2012, at 23:23, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I'd suggest an alternate method: the cache needs to contain:
1. the bar numbers of page breaks for the last _full_
compilation of file X
Then
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files to speed up
recompilation. He also said working out the details