Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-11 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
On Aug 10, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 17:11:44 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: On Aug 10, Neil Puttock wrote: BTW, if you're prepared to wrap the notes in a chord (so you have access to 'articulations), you won't even need a scheme engraver (all the processing can

custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hello, I'm currently attempting to write a custom engraver in scheme. This is the shortened code: ;; global variables to be used in `do-something' #(define g_filled #f) #(define g_direction 0) #(define g_finger 0) #(define g_string-number 0) ;; #(define-public

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Wednesday, 10. August 2011, 09:44:00 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: Hello, I'm currently attempting to write a custom engraver in scheme. This is the shortened code: It will increase the chances for a useful answer dramatically if you could attach a working example that one just has to run

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
On Aug 10, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: Am Wednesday, 10. August 2011, 09:44:00 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: Hello, I'm currently attempting to write a custom engraver in scheme. This is the shortened code: It will increase the chances for a useful answer dramatically if you could attach a

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
I have now spent ~25 minutes trying to strip down the engraver and adding what you had in your first mail, but I can't reproduce anything. The music-cause simply does not have any articulations here. So, I now wasted almost half an hour for what? Oh shoot, I confused my example scores. I just

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Neil Puttock
On 10 August 2011 15:00, Ricardo Wurmus ricardo.wur...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to change that order, or call the note-head-interface function again at the very end for processing a grob? Acknowledger order depends on the order engravers are \consist-ed (the only exception is if you set

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
On Aug 10, Neil Puttock wrote: On 10 August 2011 15:00, Ricardo Wurmus ricardo.wur...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to change that order, or call the note-head-interface function again at the very end for processing a grob? Acknowledger order depends on the order engravers are

Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object

2011-08-10 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 17:11:44 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: On Aug 10, Neil Puttock wrote: BTW, if you're prepared to wrap the notes in a chord (so you have access to 'articulations), you won't even need a scheme engraver (all the processing can take place in the NoteHead's stencil