Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Perhaps it
would be clearer if we started with single-staff polyphony with named and
explicitly created voices, along with the \voiceOne through \voiceFour
properties.
We could then introduce the \\ syntax as a simple way to handle music
where we don't care that
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:03:00 +0200
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
We could then introduce the \\ syntax as a simple way to
handle music where we don't care that temporary voices are created
and then discarded.
Seriously, how many of you had a full
I have done the reordering, please help me translating it from English
to English where necessary.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely;h=62618eb377efc8ef96a8b26837f95c2bce12da80;hb=3dab373f67842d0bf775a4cbbad3d47dd607df12
A preview of
On 8/15/08 3:25 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:03:00 +0200
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I would propose to still introduce the {...} \\ {...} feature
first, but with some bells
and whistles saying that you might
2008/8/15 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My model for the Learning Manual is that it answers the question How do I
do something? The Notation Reference tells me How do I solve problems
with something in the LM?, or How do I extend what I learned in the LM?.
The shortcuts we learn in
Graham Percival wrote:
I would propose to still introduce the {...} \\ {...} feature
first, but with some bells
and whistles saying that you might get problems together with lyrics
and automatic beaming
and telling where to look at that time.
In the LM, definitely. In the NR, these
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:03:15 -0600
Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/08 3:25 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the LM, definitely. In the NR, these warnings might be more
prominent, and/or Carl's suggestion about delaying {} \\ {}
until later in the
On 8/15/08 4:39 PM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:03:15 -0600
Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/08 3:25 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My model for the Learning Manual is that it answers the question How
do I do something?
2008/8/13 Carl Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1) At the end of Single staff polypohony:
This is a better construct to keep control of the voices, for example,
to ease a consistent assign of lyrics to the proper voice context.
might be better worded as
This construct keeps a voice alive
Francisco wrote Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:05 AM
@lilypond [guote, verbatim, relative =1]
\new Staff {
\context Voice = mel {
c4
{
\voiceOne g' g
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo e e
}
\oneVoice
g
}
}
\new Lyrics
2008/8/14 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
\new Voice is definitely better here. This is not
a good place to explain \context, but I think it would be good to say a
little more about explicitly
instantiating voices. Just a sentence with a ref
to that section in the Learning Manual would
On 8/14/08 4:05 AM, Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/13 Carl Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@lilypond [guote, verbatim, relative =1]
\new Staff {
\context Voice = mel {
c4
{
\voiceOne g' g
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo e
On 8/14/08 9:47 AM, Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/14 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
\new Voice is definitely better here. This is not
a good place to explain \context, but I think it would be good to say a
little more about explicitly
instantiating voices. Just a
2008/8/14 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've looked at the new change, and I think it's understandable. Perhaps it
would be clearer if we started with single-staff polyphony with named and
explicitly created voices, along with the \voiceOne through \voiceFour
properties.
We could then
On 8/14/08 5:21 PM, Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I don't see when could I seriously start working on Vocal
music. I have two choices: a) Reword or reorder the section and leave
Vocal to Trevor or any other GDP hero. b) Leave Simultaneous as is for
2.12 and try to
2008/8/15 Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That said, I don't see when could I seriously start working on Vocal
music. I have two choices: a) Reword or reorder the section and leave
Vocal to Trevor or any other GDP hero. b) Leave Simultaneous as is for
2.12 and try to gain some advance on
2008/8/15 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IIRC, I had mentioned I could take Vocal when I'm done with Text. As
I'm finishing my opera I'm progressing quite slowly right now, but be
assured if you don't do Vocal, then someone will (namely me, if we
haven't found anybody else until then).
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:03:48 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/15 Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That said, I don't see when could I seriously start working on Vocal
music. I have two choices: a) Reword or reorder the section and
leave Vocal to Trevor or any
Francisco Vila paconet.org at gmail.com writes:
I've been away, Simultaneous needs a slight retouch.
Francisco,
I was just rereading Simultaneous. I found a couple of changes I'd like
to recommend:
1) At the end of Single staff polypohony:
This is a better construct to keep control of
Rather than mel could you please use melody?
This make it easier for the translators.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: finished second draft?
Francisco Vila paconet.org
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently officially on Second draft:
1.3 Expressive marks
My latest changes to NR 1.3 are now in Git. Except for the possible
inspirational headword change (which can wait), this section is
complete. It's definitely
Currently officially on Second draft:
1.3 Expressive marks
/lili
1.5 Simultaneous notes
/lili
2.2 Keyboard instruments
/lili
2.4 Fretted string instruments
If any of these are finished, let me know and I'll move them into
the ``finished'' category, and Ralph will start indexing them.
Cheers,
-
Please hold on Fretted String Instruments.
I'm currently almost done with Predefined Fret Diagrams, which will add a
section to Fretted String Instruments (and will lead to reorganization).
The new organization on Fret Diagrams will be:
Fret Diagram Markups
Predefined Fret Diagrams
Automatic
I'm done with Keyboards.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please hold on Fretted String Instruments.
I'm currently almost done with Predefined Fret Diagrams, which will add a
section to Fretted String Instruments (and will lead to
24 matches
Mail list logo
