On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > Rechecking your patch, it did in fact have DOS line endings.
> >
> > So, I changed them to UNIX line endings in Vim:
> >
> > :set ff=unix
> >
> > and then it applied cleanly. Maybe something happened between th
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Rechecking your patch, it did in fact have DOS line endings.
>
> So, I changed them to UNIX line endings in Vim:
>
> :set ff=unix
>
> and then it applied cleanly. Maybe something happened between the
> creation of the patch and sending the email that changed the line
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:14:23PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > Rather weirdly, your earlier patch won't apply now either.
> >
> > Did you do
> >
> > git rebase --abort
> >
> > before trying to apply his earlier patch?
> >
> > > You've got push access now, ha
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:07:22PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > > From: Neil Puttock wrote:
> > > @lilypond[quote]
> >
> > Okay,
> >
> > here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called
> > "The Feta font" for no
2009/7/12 Patrick McCarty :
> Did you do
>
> git rebase --abort
>
> before trying to apply his earlier patch?
Of course. :) I just got confused with different patches and applied
the wrong one.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > Rather weirdly, your earlier patch won't apply now either.
>
> Did you do
>
> git rebase --abort
>
> before trying to apply his earlier patch?
>
> > You've got push access now, haven't you? If so, you can do
> >it yourself.
>
> He doesn't, but he should have ac
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:06:49PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/7/12 Mark Polesky :
>
> > Please double-check once more and apply.
>
> For some reason, I can't apply it.
>
> Applying: Docs: NR B.6 The Feta font: Organize glyph list.
> /home/neil/lilypond/.git/rebase-apply/patch:15: trailing
2009/7/12 Mark Polesky :
> Please double-check once more and apply.
For some reason, I can't apply it.
Applying: Docs: NR B.6 The Feta font: Organize glyph list.
/home/neil/lilypond/.git/rebase-apply/patch:15: trailing whitespace.
/home/neil/lilypond/.git/rebase-apply/patch:16: trailing whitesp
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > From: Neil Puttock wrote:
> > @lilypond[quote]
>
> Okay,
>
> here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called
> "The Feta font" for now. Changing it to "The Emmentaler font"
> would require changing some 50 or so cr
> From: Neil Puttock wrote:
> @lilypond[quote]
Okay,
here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called
"The Feta font" for now. Changing it to "The Emmentaler font"
would require changing some 50 or so cross-references in the
source and I think that should be a different patch.
Pl
2009/7/12 Mark Polesky :
> Is it ready to apply?
Looks fine.
If I may sugget one refinement: use the quote environment (it produces
nicer looking examples in html).
@lilypond[quote]
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.o
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:36 PM
Okay, here's a patch. Can someone test this?
Applies fine and output looks good.
My only comment is the heading - should this
not be changed to The Emmentaler font? See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00222.htm
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I just compiled the docs, and it looks great!
Is it ready to apply?
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 03:36:04PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Okay, here's a patch. Can someone test this?
Mark,
I just compiled the docs, and it looks great!
I believe Francisco brought this a while back, but we should rename
this appendix to "The Emmentaler font", since that is its current
n
Okay, here's a patch. Can someone test this?
Thanks.
- Mark
0001-Docs-NR-B.6-The-Feta-Font-Organize-glyph-list.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
On 7/11/09 12:29 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> @subsection Shaped Notes
>>
>> @lilypond
>> \include font-table.ly
>> #(display-font-table 'shape-notes)
>> @end lilypond
>>
>> @subsection Ancient Notes
>>
>> @lilypond
>> \include font-table.ly
>> #(display-font
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> @subsection Shaped Notes
>
> @lilypond
> \include font-table.ly
> #(display-font-table 'shape-notes)
> @end lilypond
>
> @subsection Ancient Notes
>
> @lilypond
> \include font-table.ly
> #(display-font-table 'ancient-notes)
> @end lilypond
I just discovered a neat tric
Mark Polesky wrote Friday, July 10, 2009 8:51 PM
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
Thanks.
- Mark
M
On 7/10/09 8:25 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Neil Puttock wrote:
>> I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I
>> think it's worth it when it looks so good.
>>
>> One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially
>> since there's no indentation for the h
Neil Puttock wrote:
> I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I
> think it's worth it when it looks so good.
>
> One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially
> since there's no indentation for the helper functions inside.
I would've been shocked had you not
On 7/10/09 1:51 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
I like it a lot.
2009/7/10 Mark Polesky :
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:51:19PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
Lo
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
Thanks.
- Mark
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
#(begin
;; some hel
24 matches
Mail list logo
