Hi there,
well, I didn't read all messages of this thread, but I see two points of
discussion:
1. we already have LSR
2. who likes to use git?
1.: Well, we have LSR, but the current implementation needs a
tomcat-server with mysql. I did use tomcat sometimes and created some
webapps, but as
: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
After some thinking, i came to the conclusion that LSR should be
redesigned.
Fristly, it should be a git repository, to make collaboration easy -
when something's a git repository, i have a habit
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
After some thinking, i came to the conclusion that LSR should be
redesigned.
Fristly, it should be a git repository, to make collaboration easy -
when something's a git repository, i have a habit of
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us
Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek
After some thinking, i came to the conclusion that LSR should be
redesigned
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us
-
From: Urs Liska
To: Janek Warchoł ; Phil Holmes
Cc: LilyPond Developmet Team ; Thomas Morley ; David Nalesnik ; lilypond-user
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR
2013/8/19 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
PS: I'd also second the idea of hosting lilypond on a more accessible server
(if that doesn't imply complicated side-effects). It is so easy to create a
fork and open a pull request, I'm sure such a step would increase the number
of contributions by
Developmet Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
After some thinking, i came to the conclusion that LSR should be
redesigned.
Fristly, it should be a git repository, to make collaboration easy -
when
Well, one question may be whether git could be an alternate
interface into the LSR. In a limited manner, it already is
(snippets migrate back from LilyPond git repository into the LSR).
Actually, I like the idea of using git for the LSR *as the storage*.
Experienced cann access it directly,
2013/8/19 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org:
Well, one question may be whether git could be an alternate
interface into the LSR. In a limited manner, it already is
(snippets migrate back from LilyPond git repository into the LSR).
Actually, I like the idea of using git for the LSR *as the
Hi,
some things were already answered by other people
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
A valid concern, but i have a counterargument: there is a web
interface for git that allows you to copy-and-paste code directly in,
or
Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
Hi,
some things were already answered by other people
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchol
A valid concern
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
However, my other opposition to git for this
purpose is that it's intended as a Version Control system, which is
completely
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
This will be my last post on this.
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchol
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
However, my other opposition to git for this
purpose is that it's intended as a Version
,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/maintaining-advanced-power-user-Scheme-functions-tp149155p149479.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
2013/8/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchol
What you said would be true if the snippets were so simple that they
never change. But they do change.
Hardly ever. I maintain the current LSR and the changes are so infrequent I
often forget to
Hi,
2013/8/17 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
The right place for them would be the LSR, _if_ the LSR would be able
to compile them and not use a LilyPond-version far too old for many of
my ideas.
There were some insinuations on the
Hi,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
2013/8/14 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
(and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
over time, and there is a problem related to that:
Hi Pierre,
2013/8/15 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Janek, Hi Harm,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still
pissed off.
Sorry for that, I think I totaly missed this discussion.
I
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
That's great!!
Though, honestly, perhaps you should wait until 2.18. is out. I still hope
it's coming soon.
You've seen the flurry of discussions and purported fixes (tending to
fall through even the regression tests) about cyclic backend
Hi,
Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
(and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get
lost in all the email threads about them, and it's not always obvious
where the most
2013/8/14 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced
(and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved
over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get
lost in all the email threads
Hi Janek, Hi Harm,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still
pissed off.
Sorry for that, I think I totaly missed this discussion.
Volunteers?
Be sure that I'd grant support.
Sure !
Maybe give me some links
24 matches
Mail list logo
