2011/3/18 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
Janek,
I prefer the newer ones,
Glad to hear this!
although I doubt I'll use them too often in real music!
Me too :)
However, I was looking at my Gardner Read and think that, strictly, all the
flag shapes are a little wrong according to his
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: shortened flags affair, part 7 - downstem full-length 64th and
128th flags
2011/3/18 Phil Holmes
On 3/18/11 5:23 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Janek,
I prefer the newer ones, although I doubt I'll use them too often in real
music!
However, I was looking at my Gardner Read and think that, strictly, all the
flag shapes are a little wrong according to his rules. The
Janek Warchoł wrote Friday, March 18, 2011 11:41 AM
I've prepared flag touch-ups, including changes suggested by Carl.
They are here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273074/
I attach a simple proof-sheet showing these changes.
I prefer your suggested flags. Thanks.
Trevor
2011/3/18 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
In general I do agree with your approach of making our own decisions based
on what's published, rather than just following it. However, I do think the
current flags are inconsistent if you compare the up-stem quaver with the
semi-quaver. The
W dniu 18 marca 2011 14:26 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
I think Read's example flags are very inconsistent, so it's hard to decide
what the details of the flags should be. I've looked throughout his book,
and the flags change from occurrence to occurrence.
Indeed. I'd
On 3/15/11 3:24 PM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
there is quite a lot of space between flag and the notehead in case of
downstem 64th and 128th notes (at least compared to 16th and 32nd
flags). I *suppose* these flags were made this way because they were
