On 30 août 2013, at 11:39, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>
>> > I suggest that we refrain from embracing your somewhat optimistic
>> > estimates until after wrapping up a stable release.
>
>> I don't see the relationship between the two.
>
> Which makes it a good thing that you are not pursuing a career
On 2013/08/30 08:55:15, mike7 wrote:
On 30 août 2013, at 10:11, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
> On 2013/08/30 07:41:49, mike7 wrote:
>
>> I'd still argue that (2) is the best way to go as it is a
> one-stop-shopping way
>> to clear all these bugs (and perhaps more) as they arise.
>
> Since we are
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:57:59 -0700, Mike Solomon wrote:
On 30 août 2013, at 07:49, "Keith OHara" wrote:
It hurts very little to find ourselves stuck with a second-choice
implementation in this case.
We won't know what our first-choice implementation is unless we see some
application examp
On 30 août 2013, at 10:11, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> On 2013/08/30 07:41:49, mike7 wrote:
>
>> I'd still argue that (2) is the best way to go as it is a
> one-stop-shopping way
>> to clear all these bugs (and perhaps more) as they arise.
>
> Since we are currently in the process of recovering from t
On 2013/08/30 07:41:49, mike7 wrote:
I'd still argue that (2) is the best way to go as it is a
one-stop-shopping way
to clear all these bugs (and perhaps more) as they arise.
Since we are currently in the process of recovering from the last
one-stop-shopping way to clear bugs galore which is
On 30 août 2013, at 07:49, "Keith OHara" wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0700, wrote:
>
>> Conceptually, I prefer (1), but this is based on your descriptions and
>> the previous discussion, not on understanding the code...
>>
>
> Then look at (2) and see if you think that would be goo
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0700, wrote:
Conceptually, I prefer (1), but this is based on your descriptions and
the previous discussion, not on understanding the code...
Then look at (2) and see if you think that would be good enough to clear the
last bugs before 2.18.
The uses of \trans
Conceptually, I prefer (1), but this is based on your descriptions and
the previous discussion, not on understanding the code...
https://codereview.appspot.com/9295044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
Untangling the stencil regressions.
The commit that made skylines from stencils (issue 2148) omitted
space-reservations for stencils that:
+ are not drawn (\transparent)
+ have unknown contents until after layout (\page-ref and similar) or
+ had their space reservation modified (\pad-around and s
