Graham Percival writes:
Dear Graham,
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager.
Thank you so much for all your initiatives and the enormous amounts of
effort you spent on LilyPond. You started from some kind of vacuum and
created a vibrating community.
I'm
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes:
On 2012-10-13 23:44, David Kastrup wrote:
\once creates a one-time-step temporary change, \temporary an
unterminated temporary change which can be terminated element-wise with
\revert
+1
That's a consistent naming scheme, and \temporary
It looks like I have managed to somehow hijack a thread which was
_definitely_ about something else. This is inappropriate and I
apologize. I hope the change of subject will help disentangling this.
The actual problem is that \override currently CLEARS (i.e. reverts)
the current value before
Am 14.10.2012 10:11, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Am 13.10.2012 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Conclusion: I appreciate your latest work – it is just that I am not
used to use \omit, \single, \undo and therefore bringing \temporary
into line with the (yet unfamiliar)
On 12 Oct 2012, at 09:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... After I'm finished my phd, I'll do the thing
which every computer science student should do at least once in
their life: I'll make my own language. I'm not comfortable with
the level of abstractions that lilypond offers. Just like
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 12 Oct 2012, at 09:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... After I'm finished my phd, I'll do the thing
which every computer science student should do at least once in
their life: I'll make my own language. I'm not comfortable with
the level of abstractions
Hello,
On 14 October 2012 07:39, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes:
On 2012-10-13 23:44, David Kastrup wrote:
\once creates a one-time-step temporary change, \temporary an
unterminated temporary change which can be terminated element-wise
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
On 14 October 2012 07:39, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The current semantics are basically non-stack, but the stack can be
reanimated temporarily from the Scheme layer.
This reanimation makes sense from the user layer in some cases as
well,
On 14 Oct 2012, at 10:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 12 Oct 2012, at 09:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... After I'm finished my phd, I'll do the thing
which every computer science student should do at least once in
their life: I'll make my own language.
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 14 Oct 2012, at 10:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 12 Oct 2012, at 09:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... After I'm finished my phd, I'll do the thing
which every computer science student should do at least once in
On 14 Oct 2012, at 13:25, David Kastrup wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 14 Oct 2012, at 10:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 12 Oct 2012, at 09:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... After I'm finished my phd, I'll do the thing
which every
12, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches
on countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone for good
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:50 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Funny that you mention that. I was talking about the situation
with my oldest friend (now a professional programmer for the past
11 years). He couldn't believe that I was spending so much energy
arguing with people who argued
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:50 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Funny that you mention that. I was talking about the situation
with my oldest friend (now a professional programmer for the past
11 years). He couldn't believe that I was
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Graham,
Many thanks for the amazing amount of energy and work you've put in
over the years. You certainly brought a very new style of leadership
to the project after I have left. I hope we can count on you to
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek wrote:
In this case, my understanding is that David was arguing against some
recent proposals because they would make it hard or impossible to
achieve corehence of design. Unfortunately, from what i see Graham
understood
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek wrote:
Unfortunately, David seems to be the only active developer that
understands some parser subtleties - in other words, only he fully
knows the whys.
Well, there is
Am 13.10.2012 21:48, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek wrote:
Unfortunately, David seems to be the only active developer that
understands some parser subtleties - in other words, only
On 10/13/2012 11:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
\once creates a one-time-step temporary change, \temporary an
unterminated temporary change which can be terminated element-wise with
\revert or, again using a converter, en bloc from the original overrides
with \undo.
Forgive me for coming into
On 2012-10-14 01:07, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 10/13/2012 11:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
\once creates a one-time-step temporary change, \temporary an
unterminated temporary change which can be terminated element-wise with
\revert or, again using a converter, en bloc from the original
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches
on countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone for good in a few months.
It's been quite a ride for the past 9 or 10 years
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches
on countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone
Graham, you wrote Friday, October 12, 2012 8:01 AM
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager.
That's a real blow. You've made an immense contribution to
LilyPond over the years. It won't be the same without you!
But nothing lasts forever; the time has
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches
on countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone for good in a few months
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: Lily-Devel List lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: stepping down as project manager
Graham, you wrote Friday, October 12, 2012 8
Am 12.10.2012 09:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches
on countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone for good in a few months.
It's sad
2012/10/12 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
Graham, you wrote Friday, October 12, 2012 8:01 AM
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager.
That's a real blow. You've made an immense contribution to
LilyPond over the years. It won't be the same
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as project
manager. I'll stick around for a while to review patches on
countdowns and participate in policy discussions, but don't be
surprised if I'm gone for good in a few months.
It's sad to hear that ...
Indeed.
I can only
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:03:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I'll do the thing
which every computer science student should do at least once in
their life: I'll make my own language. I'm not comfortable with
the level of abstractions
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
- triplets written with 3:2. I'll probably use python for the
language, so having a dictionary of hard-coded rules like
\tuplet x:y = \tuplet y/x (or \times y/x )
will be really easy. And since it's a python script, it would
be
30 matches
Mail list logo
