Re: strut problem, Re: strut problem, Re: strut problem, Re: strut problem

2022-11-18 Thread Jean Abou Samra
 > Le 19 nov. 2022 à 08:04, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : >  >> A stencil has an X extent, a Y extent and a stencil expression >> (Scheme list). That's all. >> Think of it in another way. If LilyPond gave non-empty skylines to >> stencils with empty extents, a grob with its stencil set to >>

Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem

2022-11-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> A stencil has an X extent, a Y extent and a stencil expression > (Scheme list). That's all. > > Think of it in another way. If LilyPond gave non-empty skylines to > stencils with empty extents, a grob with its stencil set to > #empty-stencil would stop taking no space. Instead, it would take >

Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem

2022-11-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> You did see the code I posted that would do what you asked for? Sorry, no, I missed it. Thanks! Werner

Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem

2022-11-18 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: > Why is the vertical extent of the strut ignored? Because side positioning is primarily based on (vertical) skylines, not extents. >>> >>> Thanks. What is the reasoning behind this? For me, this behaviour >>> is unexpected. >> >> By the way, this is

Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem,Re: strut problem

2022-11-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Why is the vertical extent of the strut ignored? >>> >>> Because side positioning is primarily based on (vertical) >>> skylines, not extents. >> >> Thanks. What is the reasoning behind this? For me, this behaviour >> is unexpected. > > By the way, this is one reason why \strut is not such