On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:36:41 +0100
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Good point, your concerns are valid. However, the difference between
> current Lily default beam thickness and average calculated from
> samples is so big (almost 0.1 staffspace), that i think we don't have
> to worry about this. Also, t
Hi Pavel,
2012/1/9 Pavel Roskin :
> Comparing scanned data to internal numbers is not a fair comparison.
> When scanning, the lines can get blurred and then they are converted to
> black-and-white based on the darkness settings. Lines can get thicker
> or thinner.
>
> The most fair comparison wou
Personally I find the thicker beams look much better.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 01:54:06 +0100
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
> napisał:
...
> > Are you measuring staff space in pixels from the top of one staff
> > line to the top of the next staff line?
>
> Yes, exactly like that. I was often measuring one
2012/1/7 m...@apollinemike.com :
>
> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>> Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>> should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>
> Can you post regtest comparisons for us to look at?
Well, there are changes in many tests, but the actual
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
> napisał:
>>
>> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>>> Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>>> should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>>>
>>> My research
W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
napisał:
>
> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>>Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>>should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>>
>>My research is here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/juulc4
>>
>>What do you th
On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>
>Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>
>My research is here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/juulc4
>
>What do you think?
Are you measuring staff space in pixels from the top of one sta
