Unless there's a totally unexpected deluge of help for the website
from my recent plea on the -user list, I can't imagine it being
ready for 2.14. And I can't recommend delaying 2.14 just for a
new website.
That said, I still think that the new website would better meet
the needs of most users,
2009/7/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
I've just got the same error. It's caused by Graham's essay makefile
hacking.
Sorry, I'll branch a dev/graham and then revert it.
OK, thanks. Now the docs compiled fine and I could check that the
result of my patch is as intended. Any
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
A quick update on the new vertical spacing: [...]
Anything I've missed?
While the new vertical spacing looks great for full scores (one system per
page), I have now run into a case where the old system worked much better. In
particular,
Reinhold
Please note that if you sign your messages in
this way people using default Windows mail systems
can't read them easily, and will most probably
just ignore them.
They appear as shown below.
Perhaps we could install PGP, but I probably
will not bother, as only you and one other on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2009 17:23:50 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Reinhold
Please note that if you sign your messages in
this way people using default Windows mail systems
can't read them easily, and will most probably
just ignore them.
Ah, sorry, my
On 10.07.2009, at 18:18, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2009 17:23:50 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Reinhold
Please note that if you sign your messages in
this way people using default Windows mail systems
can't read them easily, and
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
Thanks.
- Mark
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
#(begin
;; some
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:51:19PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
Looks
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCartypnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
It addresses all of the Bugs with solutions listed on the wiki page:
http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/SVG_backend
Does anyone
I'm trying to finish up the revisions to the autobeaming code.
I've got it working just fine when I compile from the command line.
But when snippets are included in the docs, they seem to compile different
than from the command line.
I'll take a snippet that's in the docs (not one that's
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:37:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Is there a different version of LilyPond called when make doc is running? I
can't figure out what the story is. Any clues would be appreciated.
There's different formatting options.
- you can see (probably) the right options in
2009/7/10 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I'll take a snippet that's in the docs (not one that's included as a file),
copy it to a .ly file, wrap it in \relative c''{}, and everything works
fine.
But when I compile the docs with make doc, the snippet doesn't work.
Can you explain in more
Hi Jan,
If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
(does anybody know of a lightweight
process-text-file-with-emacs-script foo program?)
Anyway, somebody with git knowledge
On 7/10/09 3:58 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 3:43 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:37:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Is there a different version of LilyPond called when make doc is running? I
can't figure
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
When run from the command line, the output that results is attached as
FromCommandLine.png.
Are you running
lilypond foo.ly
? That will call the lilypond from your PATH, which is probably a
GUB version. Alternatively, if you
2009/7/10 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com:
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
I like it. Though it
2009/7/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Unless there's a totally unexpected deluge of help for the website
from my recent plea on the -user list, I can't imagine it being
ready for 2.14. And I can't recommend delaying 2.14 just for a
new website.
There are a few technical bits
On 7/10/09 3:33 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCartypnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
It addresses all of the Bugs with solutions listed on the
Sorry, I still don't master Google webmail key bindings well :-(
2009/7/11 John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
work on bits of the translation infrastructure that have been dela lot
delayed.
I meant that have been delayed a lot.
Best,
John
On 7/10/09 4:13 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
When run from the command line, the output that results is attached as
FromCommandLine.png.
Are you running
lilypond foo.ly
? That will call the
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Ahh -- there is a clue here that I hadn't noticed before. The comments in
the code are different in the snippet from rhythms.itely and the doc
output.
That means that the snippet in rhythms.itely is *not* the one that is being
compiled for the
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
2009/7/9 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
On do, 2009-07-09 at 21:41 +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote:
Hi,
while running the regtests I spotted a warning about the use of the
deprecated md5 module in
On 7/10/09 4:58 PM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Ahh -- there is a clue here that I hadn't noticed before. The comments in
the code are different in the snippet from rhythms.itely and the doc
output.
That means that the
2009/7/11 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com:
How about using a `try' block to import conditionally?
Alternatively, a conditional block based on testing sys.hexversion,
which is already used in lilypond-book, could help.
Cheers,
John
___
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 3:33 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCartypnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:18PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
But the fonts aren't installed right for my Inkscape, so I couldn't see any
of the feta font stuff. Can you produce instructions for installing the
fonts properly for Inkscape?
And by could you produce instructions, Carl means
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:18PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
But the fonts aren't installed right for my Inkscape, so I couldn't see any
of the feta font stuff. Can you produce instructions for installing the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
And by could you produce instructions, Carl means could you
patch AU 3.2.2, since evidently the instructions there don't work
any more.
There
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
The difference is two lines of comments. The one that is showing up in the
docs is an older version than the one that is currently in rhythms.itely.
Please note that the snippet is not an included file, but is actually part
of the text in
2009/7/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Hi Jan,
If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
(does anybody know of a lightweight
2009/7/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Hi Jan,
If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
(does anybody know of a lightweight
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
And by could you produce instructions, Carl means could you
patch
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
You're fine, Patrick. Carl hasn't read AU 3.2.2, so I was making
a cheeky comment. You may recall that a similar thing happened
recently with
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
You're fine, Patrick. Carl hasn't read AU 3.2.2, so I was making
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
And by
2009/7/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
What about switching to the new website, but adding a note on the
first page to say that it hasn't been translated yet, but those
preferring other languages can browse the old website *here link*?
I vote for this. The note should be
On 7/10/09 5:52 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009
2009/7/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Similiar stuff has happened to me, but since it involves the build
process, I never bothered trying to track down the problem. I
just do a make clean, make web-clean (that's probably doc-clean
now), and regenerate everything.
You could
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Reinhold
Kainhoferreinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
A quick update on the new vertical spacing: [...]
Anything I've missed?
While the new vertical spacing looks great for full scores (one system per
page), I
39 matches
Mail list logo
