Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
May 23rd
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
!58 Doc typos: remove double backslash in `@code{}` - Valentin
On 5/21/20, James wrote:
> A bit like this (still open) issue?
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1322/
> ;)
Uh, that’s precisely one I’m trying to close… :-)
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/59
> Mind you I was sure there was some discussion in dev-lilypond
Hello,
On 20/05/2020 19:36, Valentin Villenave wrote:
By the way, isn’t it time to retire \null? Or at least change its
oh-so-deceptive name. (\point might be confusing in another way,
though; I’m open to suggestions.)
Cheers,
-- V.
A bit like this (still open) issue?
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:34 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 08:08 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> > On May 17, 2020, at 15:27, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > before merging. As we only allow fast-forward merges, this means each
> > > MR has received testing in the form it hits
Am Samstag, den 16.05.2020, 11:49 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2020, 20:31 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > To keep this short: I'd like to enable push mirroring from GitLab to
> > Savannah for the following branches [1]:
> > - master
> > - release/unstable
> > -
On 21/05/2020 12:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
so a next step might be making the countdown process more
continuous.
What does that mean - even conceptually?
The countdown is specifically to allow everyone some time to breathe and
digest patches submitted without the fear of having to be
Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 08:08 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> On May 17, 2020, at 15:27, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > before merging. As we only allow fast-forward merges, this means each
> > MR has received testing in the form it hits master. This would
> > effectively replace the current setup of
Are the scorio folks on this list?
Is scorio still being worked on? Does anyone know how it makes
stencils appear on their web interface? I am looking into cleaning up
how we generate PS and SVG files, and I don't want to make their lives
harder than necessary.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys -
At least, two of the (former?) scorio people (Johannes Feulner and
Dominik Hörnel) were attending in Salzburg, if that helps to get in
contact with them, and Johannes is in the list of my FB friends IIRC.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:42 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys
wrote:
Are the
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 18:25 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > If we think contention will be a problem, we cannot do the proposal.
> > There's no sane "mixed bag": As outlined initially, we would 1)
> > require CI for merge requests, and 2) disable direct pushes to
> > master. This
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:10 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 15:19 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> > > Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>> > > > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Am 21. Mai 2020 19:21:27 MESZ schrieb Owen Lamb :
>>
>> To preserve your code within LilyPond it probably makes sense if you
>put
>> your code into a private (but public) branch of the upstream lilypond
>> repository (i.e., not a gitlab clone of it), for example
>> 'dev/lamb/GSoC-2020'.
>>
>
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:21 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:17 PM James wrote:
> > On 21/05/2020 12:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > so a next step might be making the countdown process more
> > > continuous.
> >
> > What does that mean - even conceptually?
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:10 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 15:19 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> > > > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > > > The "traffic jam"
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:21 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:17 PM James wrote:
>> > On 21/05/2020 12:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> > > so a next step might be making the countdown process more
>> > > continuous.
>> >
>> > What
>
> To preserve your code within LilyPond it probably makes sense if you put
> your code into a private (but public) branch of the upstream lilypond
> repository (i.e., not a gitlab clone of it), for example
> 'dev/lamb/GSoC-2020'.
>
I'm a bit confused here, so let me just make sure I understand
Hi,
with master as of 15de2c8874262c2c0a9f2cc3beee5070c766dde4
$ cat buggy.ly
\version "2.18.2"
c1
$ ~/GIT/Mentor/out/bin/convert-ly -e TEST.ly
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/jcharles/GIT/Mentor/out/bin/convert-ly", line 65, in
import lilylib as ly
ModuleNotFoundError:
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 08:08 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
>> On May 17, 2020, at 15:27, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> > before merging. As we only allow fast-forward merges, this means each
>> > MR has received testing in the form it hits master. This would
>> > effectively
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> > Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 08:08 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> > > On May 17, 2020, at 15:27, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > > before merging. As we only allow fast-forward merges, this means each
> > > >
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>> > Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 08:08 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
>> > > On May 17, 2020, at 15:27, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> > > > before merging. As we only allow fast-forward
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 15:19 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> > > The "traffic jam" problem could be avoided by retaining the option of
>> > > pushing to staging.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:17 PM James wrote:
>
>
> On 21/05/2020 12:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > so a next step might be making the countdown process more
> > continuous.
>
> What does that mean - even conceptually?
My idea is that patches could enter 'countdown' stage throughout the
day, and
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 15:19 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 14:29 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > The "traffic jam" problem could be avoided by retaining the option of
> > > pushing to staging. That would occur without CI, but
23 matches
Mail list logo
