> I don't know how to check for --enable-double
There is `-D' appended somewhere after the date in fontforge's version
string, e.g.
Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML-TtfDb-D.
^^
Werner
_
this breaks make doc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5521056/diff/1/Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely
File Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5521056/diff/1/Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely#newcode38
Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely
Moving from lilypond-user to lilypond-devel:
Is the problem appearing when engravers are moved an instance of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792 ?
That or issue 44. For issue 1792 I had to expand the list of cases when
DotColumns avoid colliding chords
http://coderevie
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:52:41AM +0100, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
>that a sort of coordination is needed in each project.
We have the amount of coordination that we have chosen.
> * Let's assume that I would li
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 11:24:18PM +, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't know how to check for --enable-double but this patch assures
> that fontforge 20110222 is a requirement, not an option.
It's a start, but not enough. You need to check for
--enable-double. It's given by the versi
Reviewers: ,
Message:
ignore first 3 sentences, it was a mistake.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2203
Description:
separate narrowed accidentals
leaving arrows alone
font: narrowed variants of accidentals
As discussed in issue 2142, narrower versions
of accidentals woul
First of all I would like to apologize for misjudging Lilypond project.
As for all the emails that were written it the last two days, I believe
that a sort of coordination is needed in each project. Maybe for some of
them there must be one boss with many programmers and designers, while for
other
Quoting Carl Sorensen :
Oops, no. I forgot to mention that you should also set padding to be
something like -minimum-distance, or in your example -9.
That works!
The staves will now be fixed, but you will need to makesure to leave
enough space for dynamics, etc.
Absolutely. I just don
Quoting Janek Warchoł :
Hi Pavel,
2012/1/7 Pavel Roskin :
I believe it would be nice to have support for cross-staff chords.
Perhaps it could be done as another snippet. I'm a beginner in Scheme
and Lilypond, so it takes me quite a lot of effort. I'll appreciate
some help.
I envision having
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Graham said
"we cannot assume that we have fontforge 20110222
with --enable-double until ../configure checks for this.
This requires a change to configure.in which will be 1-10 lines of
code."
I don't know how to check for --enable-double but this patch assures
that fontfor
2012/1/7 m...@apollinemike.com :
>
> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>> Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>> should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>
> Can you post regtest comparisons for us to look at?
Well, there are changes in many tests, but the actual
On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:21 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> inspired by a pretty old post by Bertala Fodor i designed some signs for me.
> For example:
>
> #(define-markup-command (mysign layout props)()
> (interpret-markup layout props
> (markup #:postscript "0 5 translate 0.16 -0.16 scal
Dear list,
inspired by a pretty old post by Bertala Fodor i designed some signs for
me. For example:
#(define-markup-command (mysign layout props)()
(interpret-markup layout props
(markup #:postscript "0 5 translate 0.16 -0.16 scale newpath 0 0.846390
moveto 0 0 lineto 13 0 lineto 13 13 linet
David,
2012/1/7 David Kastrup :
> I really don't quite get the point of complaining that I provide
> alternative ways of accessing functionality. Nobody forces you to make
> use of them.
2012/1/7 David Kastrup :
> In the light of the focus of the work I have been doing for several
> months, I ha
Hi Pavel,
2012/1/7 Pavel Roskin :
> I believe it would be nice to have support for cross-staff chords.
> Perhaps it could be done as another snippet. I'm a beginner in Scheme
> and Lilypond, so it takes me quite a lot of effort. I'll appreciate
> some help.
>
> I envision having a Scheme functio
Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2199
2012/1/7 Xavier Scheuer :
> Dear Bug Squad,
>
> This has been reported two times in lilypond-user:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00395.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-01/msg0
Dear Bug Squad,
This has been reported two times in lilypond-user:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00395.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-01/msg00111.html
"Mark_engraver" or "Metronome_mark_engraver" should be moveable to the
StaffGroup (and ali
On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:14 AM, "Felix Kugel" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
>
>
> Using PDF manipulation libraries, i want to locate specific note head
> PDF objects and change their color. Therefore, i need to know the
> specific PDF structure produced by Lilypond, some kind of schema like
> a class di
Hi James,
thanks for that link.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/internals/index.html
I'm about to write an interactive application for prima vista reading
(in Java). I want to color played (and wrongly played) note heads, but
the roundtrip from lilypond source to PDF is too slow fo
Felix,
On 6 January 2012 14:51, Felix Kugel wrote:
> Is there any documentation about the pdf output format details?
More specifically?
We have
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/internals/index.html
which may be what you are looking for.
--
--
James
_
Felix Kugel writes:
> Is there any documentation about the pdf output format details?
LilyPond produces PostScript. PDFs are courtesy of Ghostscript, so the
details are to be asked there.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-d
Is there any documentation about the pdf output format details?
Cheers,
Felix
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: lemzwerg,
Message:
On 2012/01/07 15:18:07, lemzwerg wrote:
LGTM. Will test soon.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5527047/diff/1/lily/lily-guile.cc
File lily/lily-guile.cc (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5527047/diff/1/lily/lily-guile.cc#oldcode573
lily/lily-guile.cc:573: i
LGTM. Will test soon.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5527047/diff/1/lily/lily-guile.cc
File lily/lily-guile.cc (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5527047/diff/1/lily/lily-guile.cc#oldcode573
lily/lily-guile.cc:573: int i = scm_to_int (k);
Please apply this cosmetic patch directly to the repo
Hello, I have found this when looking for the lilypond wiki:
http://wiki.lilynet.net/
MediaWiki 1.16.5
To complete the installation, move config/LocalSettings.php to the
parent directory.
I don't really know whether to say "congratulations" or "too bad".
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.p
On Jan 7, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> I've branched current staging -- unfortunately *after* removing
> two patches which seemed to break stuff -- to staging-broken-jan7.
> I picked one patch, Mike's non-negativity check, to put into the
> new staging on the theory that it was the l
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "Keith OHara"
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
hello,
On 7 January 2012 11:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent:
hello,
On 7 January 2012 11:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Keith OHara"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:16 AM
> Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
>
>
>> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>>
>>> But please consider testing y
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: staging is a safety net, not a trampoline
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
But please consider testing your patches a bit more before sending
them in.
Sorry that was pro
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 7, 2012, at 12:06 AM, "Pavel Roskin"
mailto:pro...@gnu.org>> wrote:
Quoting Carl Sorensen mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu>>:
There is no "forced-distance" now. I can use "minimal-distance", but
there is no guarantee that Lilypond won't increase the distance between
stave
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
> napisał:
>>
>> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>>> Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>>> should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>>>
>>> My research
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm inside Clef_engraver::create_clef () - line 130 of lily/clef-engraver.cc
> I'd like to do sth based on the clef type (G, F or C). What condition
> should i use? I thought this
>
> if (ly_scm2string (clef_->get_property ("glyph-name
Ah, yes ... I will rewrite this, when I'm in my machine again
Cheers, Jan-Peter
Am 07.01.2012 um 09:42 schrieb David Kastrup :
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Am 06.01.2012 10:17, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>>> Am 06.01.2012 09:35, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hello David,
the \sour
Janek Warchoł writes:
> What i want to say is, i'm afraid you might have forgotten how it
> feels to be a non-programmer. It's not a joke that for average person
> that wants to produce some notation, it's hard enough to use text
> input.
In the light of the focus of the work I have been doing
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2012/1/5 David Kastrup :
>>
>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>
>>> 2012/1/4 David Kastrup :
\layout {
\layout-from { \compressFullBarRests
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'common-shortest-duration =
#(ly:make-moment 6 10)
}
etc...
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Am 06.01.2012 10:17, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>> Am 06.01.2012 09:35, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> the \sourcefilename hint is helpful! Thank you!
>>> If I use this in my function and do a ly:parser-clone, the location
>>> is up to date:
>>> ...
>>>
Hello Carl, Hello David,
thanks for your replies!
I will read through those threads next week. This might help me understand what
is happening under the hood.
The basic include is working as expected. But I think it would be a nice
feature if one could search for files to include using scheme.
37 matches
Mail list logo
