Hey all,
I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
I'm experimenting with the following code:
class Stencil
{
Box dim_;
SCM expr_;
Drul_arrayStencil children_;
etc...
}
and g++ gives me:
rm -f ./out/articulations.dep;
Reviewers: ,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5595043/diff/4020/input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly
File input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5595043/diff/4020/input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly#newcode5
2012/1/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
operator-friendly, i.e.
'run-a-script-and-everything-gets-done-automatically') will
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:54 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
I'm experimenting with the following code:
class Stencil
{
Box dim_;
SCM expr_;
Drul_arrayStencil children_;
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/1/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
operator-friendly, i.e.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
operator-friendly, i.e.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
defined starting point not relying on whatever happens to be checked out
in the main
On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:54 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
I'm experimenting with the following code:
class Stencil
{
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
defined starting point not relying on
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:59:57PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Don't get confused here. Don't scare people away from doing the
staging-merge by talking about test-patches.py.
I am not sure what the problem is with anybody else running it.
LGTM, although I don't understand any of the pure/unpure stuff.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504100/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm not certain that these need to be inside @knownissues rather than
the main portion of the doc, but it's not worth quibbling.
Looks good enough to me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5576063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hello,
wiki.lilynet.net is up but looks tabula rasa.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:59:57PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I assume it uses the normal git cache on my computer
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in the LILYPOND_GIT
environment variable.
- is there any danger if this is also my dev machine with other
changed files in the git filesystem (e.g. the
On 2012-01-30 12:59, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I assume it uses the normal git cache on my computer
Nope. It uses
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:07:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
smtp_command: msmtp -C ~/.msmtp-patchy -t means nothing to me.
That is command for mailing the completion message somewhere. I have no
idea what msmtp is supposed to be,
ah yes, I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:35:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:50PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The problem is that the file in question is stencil.hh.
I got around it by using Drul_arraySCM and having the drul
arrayed populated with smobified stencils.
I hope that my
6e2e1d6a13aba88a3a8eecc0d46f96ad245c152a
didn't
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I assume it uses the normal
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:50PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The problem is that the file in question is stencil.hh.
I got around it by using Drul_arraySCM and having the drul
arrayed populated with smobified stencils.
I hope that
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
logical impossibility
This is all I needed to know - thanks!
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
logical impossibility
This is all I needed to know - thanks!
Well, it forces
sizeof(x) = 2*sizeof(x)
and we know sizeof(x)= 0, so it is not logically impossible as long as
the structure
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
logical impossibility
This is all I needed to know - thanks!
Well, it forces
sizeof(x) = 2*sizeof(x)
sizeof(x) = 2*sizeof(x) of course.
and we know
[Applying rietveld 5595043 to git afb4c5fb]
It means running your own files that use this feature, and reading
the docs to see whether the docs as well as the new incarnation of
the feature make sense to you.
It was really good that you have been a pain in the neck, since your
patch
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
[Applying rietveld 5595043 to git afb4c5fb]
It means running your own files that use this feature, and reading
the docs to see whether the docs as well as the new incarnation of
the feature make sense to you.
It was really good that you have been a
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
My other current concern is to wonder whether lots of people trying to
get patchy running might not collide with each other. As I understand
it, the key patchy function is to pull patches from staging,
The current state of staging. It does not test
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:39:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
My other current concern is to wonder whether lots of people trying to
get patchy running might not collide with each other.
I don't think so; once the first set of commits were pushed to
Let me just quote one item by screenshot [...]
This looks excellent. However, I don't understand the last sentence.
What do you mean with `not transferred'?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Let me just quote one item by screenshot [...]
This looks excellent. However, I don't understand the last sentence.
What do you mean with `not transferred'?
I reworded the text and changed the example. It should now be clearer
from both text and picture.
2012/1/30 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
2012/1/30 Graham
I reworded the text and changed the example. It should now be
clearer from both text and picture.
Yes, thanks.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 06:56:08PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/30 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
that's ALREADY how it works for the staging-merge.
I guess i mean something different than you do when i say everything
gets done automatically.
I think there's confusion
2012/1/30 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
I think there's confusion between Patchy staging-merge and Patchy
test-patches.
I don't feel confused at all, don't worry about it.
i decided to pause my other Lily work and focus on improving
Patchy and our development workflow. I took
2012/1/26 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Hi,
i think the output of beam-shortened-lengths.ly doesn't look good, see
in current regtests
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/input/regression/collated-files.html
. Am i missing something?
cheers,
Janek
Thanks, Janek.
I agree. It
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Got no answers on -devel, so I forward here (probably more appropriate
place).
Thanks,
Federico
Il 05/01/2012 13:44, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
Issue 1721 reported that @rlsr{Name} keeps the text in english but
Hello,
On 30 January 2012 21:27, Ralph Palmer ralphbugl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Got no answers on -devel, so I forward here (probably more appropriate
place).
Thanks,
Federico
Il 05/01/2012 13:44, Federico Bruni ha
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
wiki.lilynet.net is up but looks tabula rasa.
Yes, this is one of those things I've been procrastinating about for
quite some time. I've been trying to upgrade the MediaWiki engine
**and** the database format,
Am 29.01.2012 10:35, schrieb mts...@gmail.com:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
The idea here is to create a generic framework that allows for
modifications to note lengths (i.e. swing) in the MIDI without having a
typographical impact on the score.
Brilliant idea, from my rather amatheurish point of
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 10:35, schrieb mts...@gmail.com:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
The idea here is to create a generic framework that allows for
modifications to note lengths (i.e. swing) in the MIDI without having a
typographical impact on the score.
45 matches
Mail list logo
