- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: Thomas Morley ; lilypond-devel
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: LSR is now on 2.14
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Sorry about the top
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com; bug-lilypond
bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:26 AM
Subject: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which
Am 3. April 2012 10:27 schrieb Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com; bug-lilypond
bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 03,
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org; David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com; bug-lilypond bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Failed
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
We need to check what the script is doing and how it responds to failing
snippets like this. I'm not in a position to do this right now, but let's
not forget it's there. I've put it on the tracker as
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:53:33PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
But there is a very basic problem:
If I test compiling the whole LSR and all is fine but compiling a
single file from LSR failes, means I can't trust my testing-results.
How can I continue the work? Having no chance to notice
Hi David,
I just checked our recent addings to the LSR.
In unfretted-headword.ly I noticed the line:
noflag = \once \override Flag #'style = #'no-flag
could you change it to:
noflag = \once \override Stem #'flag-style = #'no-flag
?
Well, the noflag-Definition isn't used in the
Hi Harm,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi David,
I just checked our recent addings to the LSR.
In unfretted-headword.ly I noticed the line:
noflag = \once \override Flag #'style = #'no-flag
could you change it to:
noflag
Hi Phil,
I just checked the snippets I added to the lsr-tarball as well as our
recent lsr-addings against the snippets from
`Documentation/snippets/new/' on
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: LSR is now on 2.14
Hi Phil,
I just
I might have some internet issues at home. Patchy hasn't pushed since
midday or emailed until now. I cannot remember what the message is if
it 'fails' to connect to the internet - I think it posts this generic
message.
I'll check when I get home, there are no commits I can see in master
or
Am 3. April 2012 16:52 schrieb David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
We need to check what the script is doing and how it responds to
failing snippets like this. I'm not in a position to do this right
Sebastiano's last mail:
Am 3. April 2012 18:31 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna vi...@dsi.unimi.it:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 3. April 2012 18:00 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna vi...@dsi.unimi.it:
All new snippets compiled happily. Now it shold be impossible to insert
wrong
Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait :
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
scaling results in disappearance of the standard paper sizes which
now get only mentioned in an appendix.
This
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Using
#!/bin/bash
for LILYFILE in *.ly
do
STEM=$(basename $LILYFILE .ly)
echo running $LILYFILE...
lilypond --format=png -ddelete-intermediate-files $LILYFILE $STEM.txt
done
(as for the whole lsr) works and it compiles!!
Am 3. April 2012 21:30 schrieb David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Using
#!/bin/bash
for LILYFILE in *.ly
do
STEM=$(basename $LILYFILE .ly)
echo running $LILYFILE...
lilypond --format=png -ddelete-intermediate-files $LILYFILE
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Looks good! It's much more assertive and professional it's an easier read
as well. Good luck!
The application should now be publicly visible here:
Am 3. April 2012 16:30 schrieb Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
My understanding is that, once a correct snippet is in the LSR, it should be
deleted from snippets/new. What will then happen is that I will grab an
updated tarball of the snippets tagged with the docs tag and run makelsr.
These
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait :
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
scaling results in disappearance of the
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait :
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
scaling results in disappearance of the
On 4/3/12 3:17 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
The application should now be publicly visible here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_w
archol/1#
Please note that i've changed the schedule, and also added a skill
evaluation as requested by
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I don't know that it makes any difference, but you should do
s/thourough/thorough/
fixed.
Great job!
Thanks!
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Paolo Prete p4olo_pr...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hello,
how can I change the size of the arpeggio (up and down) arrows?
The default size is really small
I think it may be impossible (i.e. if you increase it's font-size, the
size of the arpeggio zigzag will also
pkx166h == pkx166h pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
pkx166h Peter, this has passed our 'countdown' review, if you don't
pkx166h yet have push access you can email me a git-formatted patch
pkx166h and I can push it for you.
OK here it is.
From ee64a711a9b046496eeef116a1e1a01fe4a0df2a Mon Sep 17
For 20:00 MDT Thursday April 5
Documentation:
Issue 2416
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2416: make doc
documentation - remove description the need to touch files - R5967060
http://codereview.appspot.com/5967060/ (this already has 2 LGTM, could
probably be pushed
When a countdown completes, I mark the tracker item patch-push and
Google dutifully sends the resulting email to lilypond-auto, where it
formerly went to -devel. I wonder if the owners are getting the
notification, and if so, how we handle those tracker items which do not
have an owner?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5934050/diff/7001/lily/stem.cc
File lily/stem.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5934050/diff/7001/lily/stem.cc#newcode131
lily/stem.cc:131: Real stem_beg = internal_calc_stem_begin_position (me,
false);
On 2012/04/02 07:48:11, MikeSol wrote:
On 2012/04/02
27 matches
Mail list logo
