It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
test-patches, even though several volunteers claimed they would do so.
It has been the main reason I shelled out €20 for a week of internet
access during my spring vacation.
My limited computing resources mean that I have to take
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6105049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2012/4/22 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 00:02, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/20 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
We do not have a long history of flawless git actions from
translations, so my preference would be not to touch anything.
Good
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
On the other hand, I can not omit doing things forever just for
safety. Therefore, I have to assume a certain degree of risk. I
already apologized when it went bad. After that, everything has gone
smoothly. Git history will judge us all.
The
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:31 AM
Subject: What's with the test-patches volunteers?
It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
test-patches, even though several volunteers
Hi bug-squad,
On 22/04/12 06:39, James wrote:
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 04:12, Mark Mathias d8val...@gmail.com wrote:
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting
for something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks, Mark
As far as the bug squad are
Hi,
I have spotted a strange loop in lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc (lines 46-69):
Direction d = UP;
do
{
.
}
while (flip (d) != DOWN);
*It will be executed only once - with d set to UP.* To be executed for d =
UP and then d = DOWN, it should be:
while (flip (d) !=
Git history will judge us all.
Interesting. Up to now I've assumed God does this.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Git history will judge us all.
Interesting. Up to now I've assumed God does this.
If HE weren't a fan of distributed version control systems, why create
the world in the first place?
--
David Kastrup
___
Interesting. Up to now I've assumed God does this.
If HE weren't a fan of distributed version control systems, why
create the world in the first place?
Good point :-)
This reminds me of a joke:
Two planets meet.
`How are you?'
`Well, not very well.'
`How comes?'
`I suffer from
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 11:59, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Git history will judge us all.
Interesting. Up to now I've assumed God does this.
If HE weren't a fan of distributed version control systems, why create
the world in the first place?
sorry for the delay; I was on holidays
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please say, if there was a reason for using
do {
} while(flip(d));
instead of my macro: if (UP_and_DOWN)
Macros make code harder to read for people not into the
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have spotted a strange loop in lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc (lines 46-69):
Direction d = UP;
do
{
.
}
while (flip (d) != DOWN);
It will be executed only once - with d set
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:56 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Short of any protests, I think I'll be going with
void
Part_combine_iterator::derived_mark () const
{
if (first_iter_)
scm_gc_mark (first_iter_-self_scm ());
if (second_iter_)
scm_gc_mark (second_iter_-self_scm ());
if
On 12-04-22 03:57 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:31 AM
Subject: What's with the test-patches volunteers?
It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 16:00, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
On 12-04-22 03:57 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:31 AM
Subject: What's with the test-patches volunteers?
It
http://codereview.appspot.com/6107045/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6107045/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode1045
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:1045: % The
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting for
something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:52 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 7:40 AM, James wrote:
Hello,
On 20 April
Hello, David and all,
I'd like the lilypond/translation branch to be renamed to just
'translation' if there are no objections. David, I recall you did
something similar for 'staging'.
A good moment would be just after one or two 2.16 releases, I think. Comments?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
Hello, David and all,
I'd like the lilypond/translation branch to be renamed to just
'translation' if there are no objections. David, I recall you did
something similar for 'staging'.
A good moment would be just after one or two 2.16 releases, I
Le 22/04/2012 19:59, David Kastrup disait :
Francisco Vilapaconet@gmail.com writes:
Hello, David and all,
I'd like the lilypond/translation branch to be renamed to just
'translation' if there are no objections. David, I recall you did
something similar for 'staging'.
A good moment would
One nitpick; otherwise LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6099046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6099046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode68
I believe that this is wrong -- fingerings are fingers for fretted
instruments, not frets.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6099046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
Reviewers: Trevor Daniels, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com,
http://codereview.appspot.com/6099046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
For 20:00 MDT Tuesday April 24
Critical:
Issue 2468
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2468: augmentation
dot of a moved rest is placed on a line - R6035053
http://codereview.appspot.com/6035053/
Defect:
Issue 2449
LGTM, please push directly. Small suggestion below but I'm not
particularly enamoured with it. You can push it whether or not you like
it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6107045/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right):
LGTM, please push directly. Small suggestion below but I'm not
particularly enamoured with it. You can push it whether or not you like
it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6107045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6098050/diff/2001/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6098050/diff/2001/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode170
Documentation/changes.tely:170: Another consequence is that string
numbers and right
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6102045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6102045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1589
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Colin Campbell
c...@shaw.camailto:c...@shaw.ca wrote:
For 20:00 MDT Tuesday April 24
Documentation:
Issue 2488http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2488: Doc:
LM - Change 'Monophonic' to 'Homophonic' - R
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
For 20:00 MDT Tuesday April 24
Documentation:
Issue 2488: Doc: LM - Change 'Monophonic' to 'Homophonic' - R
6107045
Issue 2490: Patch: Document
works good for me.
I can see the sense in either splitting into two commits as you
mentioned in email (the \hideNotes commit first) or combining into one
(which makes more sense to me since they are so closely related).
http://codereview.appspot.com/6098050/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6098050/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode521
33 matches
Mail list logo
