Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> is one of the things I am spectacularly bad at. One thing that has
>> turned out to be effective at times is meeting people in person.
>
> Amen to that.
+100
> Jan and I had some spectularly bad fights over patch handling (mainly
> Jan complaining of mine). Those fig
hi Mike,
> class MyClass {
> typedef int (*happy)(int a, int b, int c);
>
> happy foo
> happy bar;
> happy baz;
> }
>
> Is there a way to define foo, bar, and baz with the same typedef in the c++
> file or do I have to enumerate all the arguments for the function definition
> à la
>
> int baz (i
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> Hey all,
>
> If I have a header file with stuff like:
>
> class MyClass {
> typedef int (*happy)(int a, int b, int c);
>
> happy foo
> happy bar;
> happy baz;
> }
>
> Is there a way to define foo, bar, and baz with the same typedef in
> the c++ file
No. The para
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:05:40PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> As to not counting oneself as developer: I think it would make sense to
>> try "workshops" on programming topics, also with the aim of putting
>> people's wishes into code and giving them a hang of how to
Hey all,
If I have a header file with stuff like:
class MyClass {
typedef int (*happy)(int a, int b, int c);
happy foo
happy bar;
happy baz;
}
Is there a way to define foo, bar, and baz with the same typedef in the c++
file or do I have to enumerate all the arguments for the function definitio
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:05:40PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> As to not counting oneself as developer: I think it would make sense to
> try "workshops" on programming topics, also with the aim of putting
> people's wishes into code and giving them a hang of how to continue.
Yes, I'm hoping to h
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 27.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Graham Percival:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Düsseldorf -- Dortmund --> 45 minutes hourly
>> Sounds good. Ok, I'm in as long as we have at least 3 developers
>> other than myself. So far there's David and
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:41:51PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Well, I do not count myself as developer,
You've got git push access. Feel like using that to add yourself
to Documentation/authors.itexi ? :)
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilyp
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:23:38PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> > The arguments are another problem that lessens the feeling of
>> > teamwork. We should be able to "agree to disagree" -- namely,
>>
>> I agree, but I have come to realize in the past year tha
Am 27.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Düsseldorf -- Dortmund --> 45 minutes hourly
Sounds good. Ok, I'm in as long as we have at least 3 developers
other than myself. So far there's David and Werner.
Well, I do not count
Hello,
I'm the designer and developer of TablEdit, tablature editor.
TablEdit exports ly files for two years.
http://www.tabledit.com/screen/lilypond.shtml
I'd like to be mentioned in the list of programs supporting LilyPond.
Would it be possible?
Matthieu
PS: I've recentl
Hi David,
On 26.06.2012 20:27, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Jan-Peter,
First of all, I agree with David Kastrup that this is a situation
where a deep fix is in order so that simultaneous ties may be tweaked
directly.
+1
In my short test, I thought of having tie-configuration and shape
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
I'm on submitting another patchset (later tonight).
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documen
Graham Percival writes:
> Notwithstanding all the above, I agree that there's a cultural
> element to this. Certain nationalities tend to favor blunt,
> direct communication: "X is wrong", while others may tend to favor
> indirect methods: "I wonder if you could possibly think about X
> again".
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I don't know exactly what "a sort-of commune in a rural region"
>> means. :)
>
> This essentially means that you are eating the same as the horses.
I could arrange for that, but for feeling horseish, it would probably
suffice to offer sleeping on straw in the barn.
--
Graham Percival writes:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Düsseldorf -- Dortmund --> 45 minutes hourly
>
> Sounds good. Ok, I'm in as long as we have at least 3 developers
> other than myself. So far there's David and Werner.
>
> Mike, are you completely unavai
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:23:38PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> I agree. I do not believe that saying "it's too hard" is a good
> solution. I am more than willing to help people this way - I am
> officially naming myself as "New Contributor Czar" and will
> propose a patch in an hour tha
> I don't know exactly what "a sort-of commune in a rural region"
> means. :)
This essentially means that you are eating the same as the horses.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Düsseldorf -- Dortmund --> 45 minutes hourly
Sounds good. Ok, I'm in as long as we have at least 3 developers
other than myself. So far there's David and Werner.
Mike, are you completely unavailable for that period? I recall
that
LGTM. One tweak, then it can be pushed directly to staging.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administra
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 05:33:47AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> > -any regression test which fails to compile or shows incorrect
> > output.
>
> For any changed test then, it is probably worth reading the header, to
> see if a subtle change that l
LGTM, can be pushed directly to staging
http://codereview.appspot.com/6326056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6342048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo
