Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
is one of the things I am spectacularly bad at. One thing that has
turned out to be effective at times is meeting people in person.
Amen to that.
+100
Jan and I had some spectularly bad fights over patch handling (mainly
Jan complaining of mine). Those fights
Hi,
I recently managed to set up LilyDev.
I think (hope) the patch below is of some use.
Of course I'm an absolutly newbie with this sort of work. It would be
nice if some could explain the next steps how to handle this patch (or
point me to the relevant CG-Chapter).
%
Hi Patrick,
A cleaned up version of this patch has been committed (and credited to
you), so you may close this Rietveld issue. You will see the fix in
version 2.15.41, the next development release.
Cheers,
Julien
http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:32:45PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Of course I'm an absolutly newbie with this sort of work. It would be
nice if some could explain the next steps how to handle this patch (or
point me to the relevant CG-Chapter).
Section 1.3 Summary for experienced developers
or
Le mardi 26 juin 2012 à 13:39 +0100, Phil Holmes a écrit :
It doesn't seem to make sense to me
for it to run as part of make doc as well, since make is a required
pre-cursor of make doc.
This doesn't seem to be true; think e.g. of
make LILYPOND_EXTERNAL_BINARY=lilypond doc
which AFAICT is
2012/6/28 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:32:45PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Of course I'm an absolutly newbie with this sort of work. It would be
nice if some could explain the next steps how to handle this patch (or
point me to the relevant CG-Chapter).
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/6/28 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:32:45PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Of course I'm an absolutly newbie with this sort of work. It would be
nice if some could explain the next steps how to handle
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:39:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
It must be possible to check that the snippets extracted from the
tarball do not contain new snippets which contain dangerous commands
- for example #'(system rm -rf /). It would be possible to use
git/gitk to check for changes, but
Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 à 13:13 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
Yes, but git is still needed so that the LSR guy only needs to
look at changes to the unsafe files. I think you already knew
this, but I wanted to get this on the record.
Sure, so the instructions related to this in makelsr and
Reviewers: ,
Message:
It's possible to add a markup to a footer/header of a specified page,
using #(which-page page-number).
Multiple settings are possible.
Please review as
http://codereview.appspot.com/6352049
-Harm
Description:
which-page
It's possible to add a markup to a footer/header
A feature should be documented, or it will not be discoverable.
If feasible, a regtest should be added in input/regression. Whether
this is possible for essentially multi-page features, I don't know, so
it is possible that this particular feature does not really lend itself
to a regtest.
Dear Team,
i see that some very interesting things are happening.
I was inactive in the last days because i've contracted pneumonia, argh... :-[
I hope to participate a bit in the discussions, but not as much as i'd like to.
best,
Janek
___
2012/6/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
(...)
Hi David,
thanks for your help.
Now the next question:
I tried to make a new patch set, I've got:
From e63620616e15f03a32e9a80ce4afe8ef5017013c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harm thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:18:41 +0200
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
i see that some very interesting things are happening.
I was inactive in the last days because i've contracted pneumonia, argh...
:-[
I hope to participate a bit in the discussions, but not as much as i'd like
to.
Get well
Il giorno gio, 28/06/2012 alle 15.14 +0200, John Mandereau ha scritto:
I'd assume that snippets should be a dependency of doc. I
don't think it should be a dependency of make, since programmers
won't want to recompile a bunch of snippets all the time.
(testing is done via the regtests,
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
I think the only pressing item is to give feedback about David's
Deutsche LilyPond Meeting. Can you come in the range of dates he
gave?
David: it just occurred to me that you only suggested weekends.
Is this because there's a group
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/6/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
(...)
Hi David,
thanks for your help.
Now the next question:
I tried to make a new patch set, I've got:
From e63620616e15f03a32e9a80ce4afe8ef5017013c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harm
Please review:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6343055/
--
John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
For 20:00 MDT Sunday July 1
Tonight's batch are all rather recent, but one is critical and we have
the extra review day, so here goes:
Critical:
Issue 2604
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2604:
LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR - R 6354044 http://codereview.appspot.com/6354044/
19 matches
Mail list logo
