Re: Fix for beaming in Kievan notation (issue 6305080)

2012-08-04 Thread aleksandr . andreev
This is definitely not an elegant approach to the problem at all (and it does not solve the issue of the warning being given out at stem.cc line 128), but it's the best I can figure out after hacking at the code for a while. Perhaps reviewers more familiar with LilyPond internals can provide some

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread tdanielsmusic
OK, I think we've arrived at an acceptable solution, albeit via a somewhat circuitous route, posted as patch set 2. I'll wait to see how this looks in the pdf version and if all is well I'll add this recipe to the CG and change the couple of other places where this level of structuring is used.

Re: go-enc2ly status update; request for reverse engineering

2012-08-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > I got go-enc2ly such that it prints useful output for simple scores (try eg. > http://www.samba-choro.com.br/partituras/porartista/vermusica?mid=8544&pos=156 > ); there are some installation instructions at > > https://gith

go-enc2ly status update; request for reverse engineering

2012-08-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi Felipe, I got go-enc2ly such that it prints useful output for simple scores (try eg. http://www.samba-choro.com.br/partituras/porartista/vermusica?mid=8544&pos=156 ); there are some installation instructions at https://github.com/hanwen/go-enc2ly/blob/master/README Your further exploration

Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)

2012-08-04 Thread m...@mikesolomon.org
On 4 août 2012, at 09:28, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > On 2012/08/01 06:45:22, MikeSol wrote: > >> Avoid measuring extents when engraving is happening because they could > be >> dependent on other callbacks which could trigger many layout decisions > before >> engraving is finished. > > > This

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Lily devel" Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:55 PM Subject: Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage Hi Phil, Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 14:02 +0100, Phil Holmes a écrit : Hi John - is this patch d

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread David Kastrup
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Hi John, > > thanks for working on this; it has been long overdue. > > Small random comments: > > * is there a need for vc-clean at all? People can just git clone the > repo when they want to have a clean tree. git clean -f -X -- David Kastrup _

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread dak
On 2012/08/04 15:11:55, Trevor Daniels wrote: On 2012/08/04 09:33:33, dak wrote: I'm sorry - I completely missed this. Probably because I was hung up by the earlier sneer and didn't take in much else. Since you ask, the bit that affected me was > A heading indented as opposed to the follo

Re: 2.15.42 regtests

2012-08-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Phil Holmes wrote Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:34 PM > I looked there, but couldn't see the changes. The volta end mark is OK, I > think, but the extra open repeat is definitely a bug, IMHO. If you agree, > I'll add it to the tracker. I, for one, agree the open repeat at the end of the previo

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2012/08/04 09:33:33, dak wrote: I don't see that ignoring even the proposal to use a combination of structuring commands with explicit markup is "the best course available". I'm sorry - I completely missed this. Probably because I was hung up by the earlier sneer and didn't take in much el

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Lily devel" Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:55 PM Subject: Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage Hi Phil, Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 14:02 +0100, Phil Holmes a écrit : Hi John - is this patch d

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi John, thanks for working on this; it has been long overdue. Small random comments: * is there a need for vc-clean at all? People can just git clone the repo when they want to have a clean tree. * you may want to reindent this properly and use && for sequential execution case "$(OUT_

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread John Mandereau
Hi Phil, Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 14:02 +0100, Phil Holmes a écrit : > Hi John - is this patch designed to fix problems like: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-11/msg00360.html Yes, exactly; the commit that adresses this issue is among the four top commits in dev/jmanderea

Re: 2.15.42 regtests

2012-08-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Keith OHara" To: Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 8:01 AM Subject: Re: 2.15.42 regtests Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: There are a number of significant changes, and 2 or 3 possible regressions. Please look and check. Almost all of these are from

Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage

2012-08-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Lily devel" Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:39 PM Subject: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage [big snip] Hi John - is this patch designed to fix problems like: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011

Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU

2012-08-04 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 24/07/2012 16:56, John Mandereau ha scritto: Il giorno lun, 16/07/2012 alle 14.57 +0200, Federico Bruni ha scritto: info manuals are only in english? I can't see other languages in /usr/share/info both info and yelp show only the english version of the manual how can I see another language?

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread dak
On 2012/08/04 09:20:57, Trevor Daniels wrote: On 2012/08/04 08:27:10, dak wrote: > But again: the real issue to me seems that we are > hiding a long chapter inside of a subsubsec already. I agree. But to fix that would require rewriting pretty well the whole of chapter 1 of the NR. I'm no

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2012/08/04 08:27:10, dak wrote: But again: the real issue to me seems that we are hiding a long chapter inside of a subsubsec already. I agree. But to fix that would require rewriting pretty well the whole of chapter 1 of the NR. I'm not going to do that. Let's just fix this simple issue

Re: vertical alignment error

2012-08-04 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 03.08.2012 21:40, schrieb Marc Hohl: [...] Programmierfehler: vertical alignment called before line breaking Fortsetzung, die Daumen drücken when I try to compile a score with a span bar: To answer my own question: the extent for span bars is calculated elsewhere, so (get-grob-property grob

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread dak
On 2012/08/04 08:06:38, Trevor Daniels wrote: On 2012/08/03 09:35:47, dak wrote: > The obvious way would be to reorganize into fewer layers. No. This is a long and complicated subsubsec Reorganizing into fewer layers would mean reorganizing the containing structure so that we don't alrea

Re: Doc: Clarify automatic beam setting (2701) (issue 6452072)

2012-08-04 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2012/08/03 09:35:47, dak wrote: The obvious way would be to reorganize into fewer layers. No. This is a long and complicated subsubsec and the point of this issue is to improve clarity. The best way of doing that is to introduce structure into the very long text. In particular we need to

Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)

2012-08-04 Thread Keith OHara
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:37:21 -0700, wrote: On 2012/08/04 07:28:29, Keith wrote: On 2012/08/01 06:45:22, MikeSol wrote: > Avoid measuring extents when engraving is happening because they could be > dependent on other callbacks which could trigger many layout decisions before > engraving

Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)

2012-08-04 Thread dak
On 2012/08/04 07:28:29, Keith wrote: On 2012/08/01 06:45:22, MikeSol wrote: > Avoid measuring extents when engraving is happening because they could be > dependent on other callbacks which could trigger many layout decisions before > engraving is finished. > This is a case where measuri

Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)

2012-08-04 Thread k-ohara5a5a
On 2012/08/01 06:45:22, MikeSol wrote: Avoid measuring extents when engraving is happening because they could be dependent on other callbacks which could trigger many layout decisions before engraving is finished. This is a case where measuring extents early seems appropriate. Phil wants

Re: 2.15.42 regtests

2012-08-04 Thread David Kastrup
Keith OHara writes: > Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: > >> There are a number of significant changes, and 2 or 3 possible regressions. >> Please look and check. > > Almost all of these are from the revert of Pál's first attempt at > issue 2553. Perhaps it would make sense for Phil to do a

Re: Unify the lexer's idea of words and commands across all modes. (issue 6445056)

2012-08-04 Thread dak
On 2012/08/04 06:34:57, Keith wrote: I'm pouting a little that this moves further from the ability to write \violin1mvt3a = { c d } but it still looks fine to me. While I agree that allowing digits into identifiers would not make sense unless one gets them allowed in all modes (or the whole

Re: Second set of volta changes (Issue 2673) (issue 6422061)

2012-08-04 Thread k-ohara5a5a
http://codereview.appspot.com/6422061/diff/1/lily/volta-engraver.cc File lily/volta-engraver.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6422061/diff/1/lily/volta-engraver.cc#newcode159 lily/volta-engraver.cc:159: SCM glyph = endbar ? endbar->get_property ("glyph-name") : SCM_EOL; This lookup migh

Re: 2.15.42 regtests

2012-08-04 Thread Keith OHara
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: > There are a number of significant changes, and 2 or 3 possible regressions. > Please look and check. Almost all of these are from the revert of Pál's first attempt at issue 2553. 'arpeggio-no-staff' and other moving time-signatures all the minor slur change