Re: LilyDev - some questions

On 5/9/18, 12:08 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Federico Bruni" wrote: Don't you have a date configuration in the system settings? I'll have a look and see if I can improve this. The thing is that

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

>> What about setting up GUB (with LilyPond) on >> https://hydra.nixos.org/? Other GNU projects like Emacs are also >> hosted there for daily builds, so it should be easy to get lilypond >> registered there... >> >> https://nixos.org/hydra/ > > Are you going to do it? Basically, I'm

Re: LilyDev - some questions

Hello On 09/05/18 07:05, Federico Bruni wrote: Hi Peter I'll reply quickly now, but I'll come back in the next days as soon as I have some time to do some testing. Il giorno sab 5 mag 2018 alle 22:24, Peter Teeson <"peter.teeson"@icloud.com> ha scritto: (3) I ran the Terminal and did

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Werner LEMBERG writes: > What about setting up GUB (with LilyPond) on https://hydra.nixos.org/? > Other GNU projects like Emacs are also hosted there for daily > builds, so it should be easy to get lilypond registered there... > > https://nixos.org/hydra/ Are you going to do it?

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

> On my GUB build machine (4 core hyperthreaded i7, 8 Gigs, SSD) an > incremental build (i.e. with a stable version of GUB with the > toolset all up to date) takes around one to one and a half hours. > If GUB needs updating, it can, as you say, take over 6 hours even on > that machine. The

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Am 09.05.2018 um 17:23 schrieb Phil Holmes: Question: How difficult/costly/... would it be to prepare a "daily build from current master" for download? Very.  We are talking about 6 hours of build time on a pretty solidly powered 8-processor machine.  Actually, we _were_ talking about that

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

- Original Message - From: "Lukas-Fabian Moser" To: ; "lilypond-user" Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 3:09 PM Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.20 But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists can

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Lukas-Fabian Moser" Cc: "lilypond-user" ; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.20 Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:

Re: beam.cc: avoid calculating an invalid reference (issue 343160043 by d...@gnu.org)

Reviewers: mtasaka, Message: On 2018/05/09 15:07:04, mtasaka wrote: I checked the patch and it looks good. Also I've confirmed that applying this patch actually prevents abort for reported rest-pitched-beam.ly and as-the-deer.ly (as-the-deer.ly was on RedHat bugzilla). Thanks, I'll take

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: > (I, for example, just recently switched to self-compiled Lilypond > because of Malte's amazing work on the \haydnTurn which was prompted > by my question. To my surprise, compiling turned out to be quite easy, > but of course there /were /some slight

beam.cc: avoid calculating an invalid reference (issue 343160043 by d...@gnu.org)

I checked the patch and it looks good. Also I've confirmed that applying this patch actually prevents abort for reported rest-pitched-beam.ly and as-the-deer.ly (as-the-deer.ly was on RedHat bugzilla). https://codereview.appspot.com/343160043/ ___

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a huge number of answers requires at least 2.19.xx but people understandably don’t want to install an “unstable” version. IIUC, the situation used to be:

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 09.05.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Malte Meyn: >> Don’t get me wrong: We can be very happy to have such a committed >> project leader. But maybe also the other developers should join >> forces to >> >> 1. find out what blocks the release of 2.20.0 >> 2.

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Am 9. Mai 2018 12:18:37 MESZ schrieb Aaron Hill : >On 2018-05-09 02:49, Malte Meyn wrote: >> But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists >> can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a >> huge number of answers requires

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Am 09.05.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Malte Meyn: Don’t get me wrong: We can be very happy to have such a committed project leader. But maybe also the other developers should join forces to 1. find out what blocks the release of 2.20.0 2. concentrate on that instead of new features. Personally, I

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

On 2018-05-09 02:49, Malte Meyn wrote: But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a huge number of answers requires at least 2.19.xx but people understandably don’t want to install an “unstable”

Re: Release schedule for 2.20

Am 09.05.2018 um 11:16 schrieb David Kastrup: Aaron Hill writes: Hi folks, It would seem the release of version 2.20 must be nearing, but I have not found anything published about the release schedule for the project. There isn't one. [CC-ing to

Re: LilyDev - some questions

Hi Peter I'll reply quickly now, but I'll come back in the next days as soon as I have some time to do some testing. Il giorno sab 5 mag 2018 alle 22:24, Peter Teeson <"peter.teeson"@icloud.com> ha scritto: My gear: Mac Pro Desktop, Yosemite 10.10.5, VBox 5.2.10 + Guest Additions and